Training Migrants how to convincingly lie their way through EU border controls...

No surprise the usual suspects would like Lauren Southern, a far right activist who uses sensationalism to stir up racial hatred with the typical pejorative racial slants to her rhetoric and not above spreading fake news to achieve her agenda.

She's even managed to get herself indefinitely banned from entering the UK, quite an achievement for a Canadian.
I love how the usual suspects on the "liberal" left are like, "We can lie, cheat and break the law if it's for a good cause. Oh and btw we'll decide what consitutes a good cause, of course."
 
Please stop calling Lauren Southern a 'she'. He's legally a man :)

I shouldn't laugh at the clip because it's not really a fair or legitimate counter-argument. But the way that protestor suddenly shuts up when Lauren tells her that she's a "he" is way too funny. I guess because it wouldn't work on anyone who isn't soaked in Identity Politics in the first place. You can see the protestor's brain just crash into itself.
 
I guess there are people out there who like watching their wives sleep with other men, perhaps the connection to certain political views isn’t just an alt right meme...

Anyway, not much chance of any serious discussion on this topic, in b4 the lock... :D
 
I love how the usual suspects on the "liberal" left are like, "We can lie, cheat and break the law if it's for a good cause. Oh and btw we'll decide what consitutes a good cause, of course."

We have a 142 page thread on Tommy Robinson that immediately contradicts your stupidly simplistic comment, since machiavellian tendencies are exhibited by people of all political persuasions

Needs to be sooner rather than later, unless striderx wants to put them all up in his house, I'm sure his female relations will be just fine.

Ahh, good old GD, where would we be without a daily dose of dogwhistle xenophobia :) Definitely don't read this article about a single (middle class, probably liberal) female who did house a Syrian refugee....and wasn't raped! :eek: Outrageous to think such things could happen, I know :(

I knew there was an ulterior motive for your lot wanting to flood (every) country with fighting-age foreign men.

It's all a plot by gay men to get laid more?

I thought your previous post above was as stupid as you were going to get, so kudos for outdoing yourself in the same day, good effort!

So we're back to the schrodinger migrant, who simultaneously steals all your jobs whilst taking all your benefits and now wants to rape all your women whilst being gay at the same time! :D
 
Last edited:
I shouldn't laugh at the clip because it's not really a fair or legitimate counter-argument. But the way that protestor suddenly shuts up when Lauren tells her that she's a "he" is way too funny. I guess because it wouldn't work on anyone who isn't soaked in Identity Politics in the first place. You can see the protestor's brain just crash into itself.

 
Ahh, good old GD, where would we be without a daily dose of dogwhistle xenophobia :) Definitely don't read this article about a single (middle class, probably liberal) female who did house a Syrian refugee....and wasn't raped! :eek: Outrageous to think such things could happen, I know :(

I read the Police report for England and Wales in 2016 which said that 900 "Syrian refugees" in the UK had committed crimes such as rape and child abuse, so against a story of "see, refugees aren't bad" that's 900 events which show that yes, some are bad and until people can admit the reality, that there is both good and bad, and ditch the blinkers which say all refugees are good and must be believed, there will never be a chance at a decent conversation about who genuinely needs our help.
 
Ironically, some of the real victims of the NGO’s tactics are the refugees themselves – the real refugees who were forced to compete with fake candidates trained to game the system.

That's not how this works. Asylum applicatons are assessed on a 'first come, first served' basis. There is no 'competition.'
 
I read the Police report for England and Wales in 2016 which said that 900 "Syrian refugees" in the UK had committed crimes such as rape and child abuse, so against a story of "see, refugees aren't bad" that's 900 events which show that yes, some are bad and until people can admit the reality, that there is both good and bad, and ditch the blinkers which say all refugees are good and must be believed, there will never be a chance at a decent conversation about who genuinely needs our help.

I don't disagree with you and nowhere will you see anyone saying that "no refugee is bad" but you see plenty of people saying "all refugees are bad" and to be honest the sensationalist headlines as per The Sun article you linked doesn't help to have a sensible debate either. I mean, in that article, of the 238 arrests in London, 2 were for rape ad 7 for sexual offences (undefined), but the casual xenophobic comments like Jaffa's infer an underlying assumption that rape is a certainty from a refugee, rather than a small % of the refugees who even commit a crime who themselves are a minority of the overall refugee total. But The Sun knows exactly what it is doing by making those offences part of the headline.
 
I'm more than happy to have a bunch of sexually repressed men bunk up.

Please, please, please tell me that's not a statement that you're a gay man. Because many of these migrants are coming from cultures that despise you.


Would be better if it were longer and showed the protestor's stumbling to backtrack. And if it didn't have a swastika in the top-left.

That's not how this works. Asylum applicatons are assessed on a 'first come, first served' basis. There is no 'competition.'

That's competition. If a person claiming to be a persecuted Christian gets in ahead of an actual persecuted Christian, then they've taken the "first come, first served" actual persecuted Christian's place. And, incidentally, probably left that actual persecuted Christian trapped in a camp riddled with ISIS supporters and others who will continue that persecution.
 
That's competition. If a person claiming to be a persecuted Christian gets in ahead of an actual persecuted Christian, then they've taken the "first come, first served" actual persecuted Christian's place.

They don't take someone's place. That's the beauty of the system. Nobody takes somebody's place, because there's no 'place' to take. You get assessed as soon as you apply for asylum, simple as that. If you're found to be a genuine refugee, you're allowed in. If not, you're rejected.

And, incidentally, probably left that actual persecuted Christian trapped in a camp riddled with ISIS supporters and others who will continue that persecution.

Please list all the refugee camps currently 'riddled with ISIS supporters.' I'll wait.
 
Back
Top Bottom