UKFSN users in plz

Yea, seems to be getting a tad better.

I noticed I can rip stuff down at 600+ easily most of the time now. Except for Ubuntu, which apparently only wanted to download at 300kb/s. I also downloaded a 170mb file from a popular torrent the other day, I went to get a drink and it was done when I got back!

I also noticed theres yet another central on the NOC list! :rolleyes: :cool:


Another thing which I found funny, they wouldn't reset my SNR unless there was a fault on the line... I sent them a somewhat snotty reply but haven't have one back yet. :(
 
WotDa said:
I also noticed theres yet another central on the NOC list! :rolleyes: :cool:


Another thing which I found funny, they wouldn't reset my SNR unless there was a fault on the line... I sent them a somewhat snotty reply but haven't have one back yet. :(

I think that is due to BT not letting them do so. If your not losing connection you do not need it increasing. If you are losing sync raise a fault and then request it to be increased. :cool:

I just noticed that. Was about to post. :D
 
WotDa said:
I also noticed theres yet another central on the NOC list! :rolleyes: :cool:
Yikes! That's a serious amount of Central bandwidth but also a serious amount of cash. You do have to wonder where the funding is coming from - is Enta burning a huge amount of venture capital or is their subscriber base actually big enough to support this level of investment?

Does anyone know if Enta supply ADSL / bandwidth direct or is it all through the resellers?
 
rpstewart said:
Does anyone know if Enta supply ADSL / bandwidth direct or is it all through the resellers?

They supply some stuff like leased lines, SDSL, bonded connections, private WAN and some other stuff iirc, although their website is a bit of a dog to navigate. I did find they sponsored Wolverhampton (or similar sounding club :p) in the past.

Trifid, I asked them to up it by 3 when I kept getting errors, but I actually saw no increase, just a lower sync, it seems in this case most of the errors were fixed by turning interleaving on. :(
 
Last edited:
LoadsaMoney said:
Is it my eyes or have they stuck a 7th central on there. :p

Chokes on tea...

Reminder to self, 2 and 4 are global...

(They are not ordering any more globals due to the poor performance of installing them over there...)
 
LoadsaMoney said:
Anybody having trouble uploading, ive had no upload since yesterday, yet my download speeds are perfectly fine. :confused:

Nope no issues here.


I'd tell you which pipe I'm on, but that doesn't seem possible atm.
 
Hi im about to migrate from tiscali :o to ukfsn.
Could any one tell me if my sagem f@st 800-840 modem will be ok for max home service. I may also be geting a Netgear DG834 router soon and sharing the conection between two computers. On the migration page on uksfn do i say i want 1 static ip or 8?
Sorry for the being such a noob and thanx for any help.
 
A quick google it appears it is compatible. I only really wanted to say is, if you had to ask whether you need 8ip's than you do not need them. Also it is less secure as you have a direct connection to the internet and not hidden on a separate network.
 
my 2p worth is get the 8 ip.if in future you want to use them it is easier to already have them than to get them later.
actually i have 8 but have been unable to use them like i did with my 4 on Eclipse :o
anyone got an idiots guide to use them(i.e. i can only connect to UKFSN when i enable `Dynamically Assign`if i enter any of my 8 allocated ips it refuses to connect) :)
 
I have just orderd the home max 30 package and on the cofmation e-mail it says there is a £45 migration charge :confused: i though it was free to migrate if you had a mac code?
 
It depends who you're migrating from - from IPStream it's free, from LLU it costs the same as a new activation fee.
 
Back
Top Bottom