Based on what ? Because you watched the HBO series on Chernobyl ?
Nope but the fact that it's nuclear would you really want to bomb it and find out.
The fact he's asking Russian to cease fire on the NPP tells you something
Based on what ? Because you watched the HBO series on Chernobyl ?
Look if Putin launches 160 nukes at the UK the UK is gone, if we launch 160 at Russia is Russia completely destroyed?You obviously fail to grasp the concept of why its called a deterrent and the concept of MAD.
Why Russia, USA feel the need to have 5000+ is because they had an arms race after WW2, just stupidity really.![]()
That's the biggest question at the moment. He can all ways declare that he wiped nazis out of Ukraine and job is done. Media back in russian could spin it the way they want to see. But inner humiliation is still there. So what do you do?
Ok so why do we need more. The US has 1500 or so, France has 400+. What good is a deterrent if Putin is actually as deranged as people make out? Our 160 nukes won’t mean a thing to him.You do realise those 160 nukes we have could destroy Russia along with the rest of the world.
whether its 10 or 1000 just firing 2-3 of them is enough to cause huge harm to the planet and firing 10+ is pretty much dooms day level stuff.
Why Russia, USA feel the need to have 5000+ is because they had an arms race after WW2, just stupidity really.![]()
Look if Putin launches 160 nukes at the UK the UK is gone, if we launch 160 at Russia is Russia completely destroyed?
Look if Putin launches 160 nukes at the UK the UK is gone, if we launch 160 at Russia is Russia completely destroyed?
Ok so why do we need more. The US has 1500 or so, France has 400+. What good is a deterrent if Putin is actually as deranged as people make out? Our 160 nukes won’t mean a thing to him.
Being able to engage and destroy your enemy before they can shoot at you helps, Russian tanks have nowhere near the range of NATO tanks
Ok so why do we need more. The US has 1500 or so, France has 400+. What good is a deterrent if Putin is actually as deranged as people make out? Our 160 nukes won’t mean a thing to him.
Maybe I’m getting mixed up with a previous post. I thought someone mentioned that it would take quite a few to render the World inhabitable.Yes. 160 could take out every strategic position of important, then the remaining fall out destroys Russia totally along with the majority of rest of world too, just firing a few of these weapons is bad news, let alone the 100+ arsenal some countries have and Russia and USA have over 10,000 between them, NUTTERS!
Your missing the point totally, just 1 is bad news.
Putin is not going to fire nukes, firing nukes is world ending full stop! He fires them, Russia is wiped of the face of the planet, no let me rephrase that, the planet is dead totally.
Nukes are propaganda, E-penis flexing, nothing more because to use them is game over for everyone, so it won't happen, if it does just hope your near the main blast, you won't know about it.
I wouldn’t want Ukraine to have one either. We can’t just start handing them out like sweets on the playground.Oh and nukes clearly mean a huge amount to him, he is scared of Ukraine getting even one, after all is that not one of his reasons for this special operation as he calls it?
Quite surprised that NATO haven't stepped in due to the attack on the Nuclear Power Plant, this would affect the world 6 times over if radiation was to leak as Chernobyl was 1 power plant but 6 of them if they get control and use the plant as bribery.
Maybe I’m getting mixed up with a previous post. I thought someone mentioned that it would take quite a few to render the World inhabitable.
Pandora’s box has been opened. Either create more and more in the name of mutually assured security or decommissioning in the name of self preserved sanity. Problem is like Carlin said everyone is paranoid that the other wants to bend him over first.
Yes I too am surprised they haven't kicked off WW3.![]()
Yes I too am surprised they haven't kicked off WW3.![]()