Ah, okay, I missed that. Still huge though, I don't see the Reps declining it, do you? The Ukraine support bills so far have had massive cross-party support in both houses.
Pentagon McMansions don't build themselves.
Ah, okay, I missed that. Still huge though, I don't see the Reps declining it, do you? The Ukraine support bills so far have had massive cross-party support in both houses.
Why is the gas thing just a German problem and not an EU one? Surely all EU members should be equally pooling resources so that Germany can stop being Putin’s poodle? Isnt that the whole point of the EU?
its lucky for Ukraine that the UK is free of the EU as otherwise I imagine the level of support would be tempered by EU meddling.
I am sure that someone will be along soon to point out that of course we would have been able to do our own thing all along. Which is likely to have been true as the UK has probably the largest independant armed forces in Europe (France and Russia may argue) and we have never been backward in deploying when asked, except Syria where our own parliament intervened. So yes we would still have trained Ukraine and delivered them weapons in spite of the EU.Why is the gas thing just a German problem and not an EU one? Surely all EU members should be equally pooling resources so that Germany can stop being Putin’s poodle? Isnt that the whole point of the EU?
its lucky for Ukraine that the UK is free of the EU as otherwise I imagine the level of support would be tempered by EU meddling.
What do you mean by this? It's not a case of simply rerouting a few essential gas pipes from neighboring countries. Your talking about decades long standing infrastructure built during relative peace time. Energy supply and where it comes from on a country to country basis has very little to do with EU policy.
I am sure that someone will be along soon to point out that of course we would have been able to do our own thing all along. Which is likely to have been true as the UK has probably the largest independant armed forces in Europe (France and Russia may argue) and we have never been backward in deploying when asked, except Syria where our own parliament intervened. So yes we would still have trained Ukraine and delivered them weapons in spite of the EU.
Why is the gas thing just a German problem and not an EU one? Surely all EU members should be equally pooling resources so that Germany can stop being Putin’s poodle? Isnt that the whole point of the EU?
its lucky for Ukraine that the UK is free of the EU as otherwise I imagine the level of support would be tempered by EU meddling.
Utterly grim. Nuke Russia.
So yes we would still have trained Ukraine and delivered them weapons in spite of the EU.
Some good news.
Ramzan Kadyrov says he received an order from Putin to conquer first of all the regions of Donetsk and Luhansk and after that Kyiv and all the other cities.
Why do you think this is good news?
Why do you think this is good news?
Why is the gas thing just a German problem and not an EU one? Surely all EU members should be equally pooling resources so that Germany can stop being Putin’s poodle? Isnt that the whole point of the EU?
its lucky for Ukraine that the UK is free of the EU as otherwise I imagine the level of support would be tempered by EU meddling.
no, the EU is a trde union. All members states are sovereign and responsible for their own choices in such matters.
And no, it nskes no difference at all to Ukraine whether the UK is in the EU or not.
I'm more concerned about France currently than I am about Germany.