Looking like real fun and games are very much a potential reality now.
I don't get the way the US is reacting - either Putin has pulled their pants down for a laugh and they don't know it yet, or they know something we don't.
Looking like real fun and games are very much a potential reality now.
Germany will sleep walk into being pacified by Russia at this rate and be hated by the other half of Europe no doubtThe pipeline is tricky for them , but there is absolutely no way they let Ukraine fall over some fuel.
Germany is one that seems to fear Russia the most. Perhaps they are thinking about what if this war escalates beyond Ukraine.
Absolutely they would. There is no desire in Poland to look east.
My Brother-in-Law is currently in the far North of Finland for a week or so with work and has said that there are a lot of fast jets buzzing around the skies. My guess would be that they'll be monitoring what Russia is doing in, and around, Murmansk.
I thin Biden is less concerned with Europe invasion than China invasion given the impact to the US. The US is still operating in full on America first mode from Trump. I don’t thin the US has the stomach for more war in Europe, so the NATO EU plus France needs to step up. However I have the ugly feeling that nothing will be done for the Ukraine.
I mean, if you're going to twist/omit facts then yes it would look 110% one sided >.>
To answer your points though:
No Russia didn't invade and take Crimea, their troops were already there (as part of an agreement with Ukraine) when the 2014 coup in Ukraine took place and the Crimean government took the opportunity to secede from Ukraine and hold a public vote on re-joining Russia (which passed, and Russia accepted). Now valid arguments can be made on both sides about whether Crimea should have done it, and whether Russia should have agreed to their request but it's a bit unfair to blame it on Russia when it was caused as a direct result of the Ukrainian coup, and Russia were by no means the cause of that. (NB: My personal thought on it are that Crimea should have waited after seceding before holding a vote on reunification, as the Russian presence would have stopped Ukraine from re-annexing the region so they had time to invite independent/UN/etc observers in to validate the result was genuine).
No Russia didn't invade and take the Donbass region, if they had done they would either have held or still hold the Donbass region, it wouldn't be mostly held by Ukrainian loyalists with Russian backed/armed/supplied rebels holding small territory in the far east. It should be noted that the rebel self proclaimed "republics" have repeatedly asked to join Russia and been repeatedly told no (NB: My personal thought on that last note is that Russia's refusals probably have less to do with caring about right/wrong and more due to such actions not having the international law precedent that Crimea's secession/reunification did, as self determination is easier to proclaim when you have an actual government and a history as a sovereign region/republic).
Firstly the troops/exercise weren't "bang on the border" (to put it in non-sensationalist perspective the British army hold training exercises in Britain that are closer to France that the exercise in question was to Ukraine). Secondly the reason they held the exercise in that part of Russia is because they have been doing so for decades, Ukraine even used to send forces to take part. It's never been a problem until the media started hyping it as one (which is what caused politicians to snowball this entire farcical standoff).
Your completely correct on your last point however and Russia are being flat out retarded if they think NATO will agree to pulling back troops (maybe they know this and are making crazy demands so they can fall back to their real demands and look like they gave ground?). Threatening Finland/Sweden not to join NATO is another dumb move, however the threat was basically "if you make yourselves a threat to us we will treat you as such" which is kind of understandable, but if they want to deter them from joining NATO they are going about it totally the wrong way. (NB: The funny thing is that even if NATO pulled all troops out of Poland and kicked Poland out of NATO it wouldn't matter because it would still be an EU state and if Russia invaded it would instantly be at war with the EU, most of which are in NATO xD).
I don't get the way the US is reacting - either Putin has pulled their pants down for a laugh and they don't know it yet, or they know something we don't.
How do you mean? Do you think that the US have not reacted correctly?
I think they're seeing this as the greatest real threat from a near-peer adversary that they've ever had. They are cognisant that they are required to maintain stability in Europe, just look at the sheer bases, manning and machinery in EUCOM. Added to that is China playing silly buggers in the South China Sea, with huge build up. Throw in the Covid spice, a weak president and all the socio-economic issues the US is perpetually tussling with/distracted by right now and you've got a lovely **** stew to quaff down.
Interesting to see how this all unfolds.
Near peer adversary would be pushing it a bit. The US spends more than 10x and the US forces alone are greater in number than Russia never mind it’s NATO that will fight this. Whilst the threat should never be underestimated this will be more than likely Russia’s defeat.How do you mean? Do you think that the US have not reacted correctly?
I think they're seeing this as the greatest real threat from a near-peer adversary that they've ever had. They are cognisant that they are required to maintain stability in Europe, just look at the sheer bases, manning and machinery in EUCOM. Added to that is China playing silly buggers in the South China Sea, with huge build up. Throw in the Covid spice, a weak president and all the socio-economic issues the US is perpetually tussling with/distracted by right now and you've got a lovely **** stew to quaff down.
Interesting to see how this all unfolds.
Near peer adversary would be pushing it a bit. The US spends more than 10x and the US forces alone are greater in number than Russia never mind it’s NATO that will fight this. Whilst the threat should never be underestimated this will be more than likely Russia’s defeat.
Near peer adversary would be pushing it a bit. The US spends more than 10x and the US forces alone are greater in number than Russia never mind it’s NATO that will fight this. Whilst the threat should never be underestimated this will be more than likely Russia’s defeat.
Military spending is a poor indicator on a nations ability to conduct war.
It's the standard paranoid US approach.The Americans are acting like it is a done deal, the Russian hordes lined up 2 feet from the border, guns drawn, waiting for the whistle to blow.
From what is available in the public domain though that isn't really the picture - the vast majority of military movements are normal levels of traffic for the situation - an unstable border. Yes the Russians have been building up higher levels of equipment than normal levels, they've seemingly pulled hardware out of mothballed stock which isn't exactly defensive of nature including the likes of Tyulpans, been upgrading infrastructure and at a higher level of mobilisation than normal but not excessively so. It is certainly a situation to watch out for but the US is acting like things are pretty much set in stone now.
It will come down to how many Russia want to give to take Ukraine. The killing efficiency of the US and NATO forces will be far greater.Not intending on heading into a protracted discussion about the US vs Russia in a dog fight. Military spending is a poor indicator on a nations ability to conduct war. In the simplest of terms, an outright full on confrontation between the two would be devastating for both sides. Further to that, yes they have a huge defence budget, but remind yourself that is for the most high tech equipment and for essentially policing the whole globe.