Also rolled into Czechoslovakia in 1968.
I agree completely, but Russia still remembers that it was invaded by a European army and lost 20 million people, so go tell them that.
NATO minus the US still has a population of 600 million people, if those countries funded their militaries at an appropriate level they absolutely should have nothing to fear from Russia, a country with a quarter of the population.
So I'm not allowed to ask a question? Maybe you could just answer, its not a complex question. Do you think population size is what dictates defence spending, yes or no?Maybe you could just make your point instead of asking questions, obviously not
What about that time the soviets invaded Poland, the Baltics, and Finland (winter war anyone?).
You can't have it both ways, both aggressively attacking when it suits, and then justifying aggressively attacking for defensive purposes when that suits instead.
I really don't get what you're trying to prove here with any of this. There is no valid justification for Russia invading Ukraine, no matter what the US did or didn't do, or the Russian perception of losing their grip on the eastern European states they held back economically for many years.
I don't think anyone is going to agree that Russia has any truly valid concerns, all they're doing is forcing countries to band together more tightly against them, boost military spending, and adding more members to NATO on the border with Russia.
If you're going back historically speaking, the Russians have a long and storied past of imperialism and expansion, which is precisely what this is.
What about that time the soviets invaded Poland, the Baltics, and Finland (winter war anyone?).
You can't have it both ways, both aggressively attacking when it suits, and then justifying aggressively attacking for defensive purposes when that suits instead.
I really don't get what you're trying to prove here with any of this. There is no valid justification for Russia invading Ukraine, no matter what the US did or didn't do, or the Russian perception of losing their grip on the eastern European states they held back economically for many years.
I don't think anyone is going to agree that Russia has any truly valid concerns, all they're doing is forcing countries to band together more tightly against them, boost military spending, and adding more members to NATO on the border with Russia.
If you're going back historically speaking, the Russians have a long and storied past of imperialism and expansion, which is precisely what this is.
Maybe you could just make your point instead of asking questions, obviously not
I'm explaining the Russian point of view, it's not me justifying it.
Chinese President Xi Jinping should press Vladimir Putin to "halt the war crimes" in Ukraine, the US has urged.
NATO works because everyone brings something to the party. The US brings logistics amongst many other things like its sheer military might. Do you think Europe stands firm for Ukraine without the US front and centre? Does it hell. Do you think Russia is afraid to challenge NATO countries like Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia without America having their backs? Do you think those nations would feel secure without America in NATO? The answer to that question is no.
Total deaths for the Soviet Union were about 27m. The Russian SFSR lost around 6.5m military dead and around the same number in civilians or about 13% of the reported population. Belarus bore the worst of Nazi war crimes by far as a share population losing around a quarter of it’s population, followed by Ukraine at around 16%.Why are you banging on about WW2? Nothing you post changes the fact that Russia was invaded and lost 20 million people, of course they view themselves as victims of Nazi aggression, irrespective of what we think or what happened prior to that.
So to not defend the indefensible one must become a Russian whisperer?
Amazing that a white guy from the north of the UK is mansplaining how the ruskies feel.
I think it's useful to understand the oppositions points even if you disagree with them. Crazy notion on here I know
German-Soviet Pact
The German-Soviet Pact paved the way for the joint invasion and occupation of Poland by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union in September 1939.encyclopedia.ushmm.org
USSR literally switched sides after Germany invaded, but thats ok - enemy of my enemy is now my friend!
So m,uch was Churchills hatred of Communism, he strongly advocated for troops to land in the Balkans from Italy , to get there before the soviets did.
Another crazy notion is when your lack of knowledge-but-have-an-opinion is called out, you literally ignore it. Reminds me of another, now banned, poster....
Good luck achieving anything substantial using human waves. Tried that in WW 1, how that work out?Alsow, while at risk of going slightly more off-topic, it's worth considering that a large portion of the "How" Russia came to lose over 20million people in the war probably have very similar parallels to why they continue to loose hundreds of men every day in Ukraine now.
Their "tactics" are laughable. It's a zerg rush. It's always been a zerg rush. It's how they fight. Try to overwhelm the enemy with numbers.