here is an example of forward thinking military theory that made WW I what it was.Was just thinking it through about why they don't just push 20k men through one area to absolutely decimate the front line
But why stop at 20k?
On a serious note, just like in WW I, military theory seems to be struggling. Its been decades since roughly equal forces met on a frontline and experience from recent "colonial" conflicts doesn't apply.
If blitzkrieg breakthroughs with encirclements are out of the question, all that remains is to slug it out until one side can't sustain the losses
Last edited: