Ukraine Invasion - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar

Status
Not open for further replies.
It could go like this
  • Set a date for Ukraine to join NATO. Within 6 months.
  • Massive build up of NATO troops and military hardware in Eastern Europe.
  • Offer the Russians a deal which expires the on the day Ukraine is set to join.
  • Crank up the military support for Ukraine
  • Send special forces in to cause some real havoc in the preceding month or two.
  • Make it fairly clear NATO airpower will be used if they let the deal lapse.
  • If they want to use nukes to defend something they are going to lose anyway that’s on them.
  • It’s all over before Christmas.
Problem is you'd have to be prepared for them to call our bluff. While if NATO 'agree' to admit Ukraine after the war it forces Russia to the negotiation table
 
Where to even start haha. I seem to recall some history of interaction between some of these states. Maybe that has something to do with something?

Or maybe their party political broadcasts state "we hate Russia and so will... only lower your income tax if you hate them too." Yes, you're right it must be politics.

Probably more to do with Russia helping the Nazis then enslaving them after 'liberation'

Just a simple thought.
 
How the hell does an idiot like this get elected to Congress? She likes to ignore the trillions in hardware that those NATO partners have bought from the US. I don't think she is on the Kremlin payroll as I don't think she has the brains to figure how to do it but she may as well be :mad:


We have our own who want out of international treaties because they don’t like the outcomes, but in our case looking to withdraw from the ECHR. Headbangers everywhere you look these days.
 
It’s obviously preferable to let Ukraine win that fight for many reasons. Not least the message it sends to Russians about the true levels of mismanagement their country has seen throughout the Putin years.

You still haven’t answered my question.



It’s the bit right before the question mark in case you missed it.

You’d have to be mental to threaten Russia with direct action. It would galvanise the majority of Russia and it’s satellite states to mobilise to a war footing. Not to mention the fact that NATO aggression plays into Putins hands by adding legitimacy to the nonsense that the US wanted to attack Russia all along.

This action would force the rest of the world to pick sides, the crazies would come out of the woodwork and history tells us what this leads to.
 
Last edited:
You’d have to be mental to threaten Russia with direct action. It would galvanise the majority of Russia and it’s satellite states to mobilise to a war footing. Not to mention the fact that NATO aggression plays into Putins hands by adding legitimacy to the nonsense that the US wanted to attack Russia all along.

This action would force the rest of the world to pick sides, the crazies would come out of the woodwork and history tells us what this leads to.

Trouble is the conventional nuclear doctrine dictates that neither power gets directly involved in the fight. Not in Europe anyway. But one is already in the fight. in fact they started the fight. So to large extent the wheels are already in motion.

The idea that Eastern Europe are staying out of this if there isn’t divisive outcome in favour of Ukraine at some stage soon is a pipe dream. They aren’t going to sit back and wait for the inevitable if they can strike now when Russia is week.
 
Last edited:
The trip wire strategy cannot be relied upon so Regardless of the war outcome, nato must place overwhelming deterrent forces on the border to protect Europe. The only question is whether that border is in the baltics and Poland or in eastern ukraine.


There is no good outcome here for Putin. If he loses he's dead, if he wins he does so by costing his country the equivalent of 20 to 30 years of military build up. Either way, whether russia loses in ukraine or not, they lose anyway because nato is going to station a million soldiers on the border.

There is no outcome in this war that results in Russia being better off, regardless of what putin will try to claim. Russia will end the war in a much weakened state and a much stronger nato

Not to mention Russia has already lost one of its sea access routes

 
Last edited:
Trouble is the conventional nuclear doctrine dictates that neither power gets directly involved in the fight. Not in Europe anyway. But one is already in the fight. in fact they started the fight. So to large extent the wheels are already in motion.

The idea that Eastern Europe are staying out of this if there isn’t divisive outcome in favour of Ukraine at some stage soon is a pipe dream. They aren’t going to sit back and wait for the inevitable if they can strike now when Russia is week.

Let’s gang up and attack them Russians because they are weak!

Interesting mindset.
 
Those Lancet missiles seems to lack punching power, just seen a video of a T64 getting hit on the roof by 2 of these things and the only visable damage in the frame was the wreckage of the Lancets.
It's worth noting that lancets weren't specifically designed to kill NATO tanks (similar to how NLAW/Javelin were specifically designed to be used against T-series tanks and Asian clones), granted they're probably **** but it's still worth noting as you can't really evaluate a tool when it's being used for the wrong job.
 
Last edited:
Lancets are most affective against soft targets like artillery, anti air etc.

Oryx lists shows they have destroyed about 100 Ukrainian targets, nearly all of which is artillery and trucks
 
Last edited:
I read somewhere we had 1000 of these in our inventory
We ordered 700-1000 back in 1996, France ordered 500 in 1998 and have added smaller numbers since.

Actual totals are unknown/classified. The only reason we heard about the 1996 deal was because the Tories wanted to shout about the British jobs they were safeguarding, presumably due to fear of a New Labour landslide in the following years general election, we'll have to check back and see how that goes for them.
 
How the hell does an idiot like this get elected to Congress? She likes to ignore the trillions in hardware that those NATO partners have bought from the US. I don't think she is on the Kremlin payroll as I don't think she has the brains to figure how to do it but she may as well be :mad:

If Trump (or similar) gets in again I would bet he would make it a reality.
 
Trouble is the conventional nuclear doctrine dictates that neither power gets directly involved in the fight. Not in Europe anyway. But one is already in the fight. in fact they started the fight. So to large extent the wheels are already in motion.

The idea that Eastern Europe are staying out of this if there isn’t divisive outcome in favour of Ukraine at some stage soon is a pipe dream. They aren’t going to sit back and wait for the inevitable if they can strike now when Russia is week.
Also, if we are too passive in the face of atrocities it emboldens Putin to escalate. In my opinion people have got this the wrong way round, it's a paradox.
 
Last edited:
Let’s gang up and attack them Russians because they are weak!

Interesting mindset.
Nazi Germany was weak once too, it's a pity we didn't act then. Hitler was mocked as a clown, an unserious individual who could be controlled and manipulated. As these dictators conquer countries and take resources they become stronger:


 
Nazi Germany was weak once too, it's a pity we didn't act then. Hitler was mocked as a clown, an unserious individual who could be controlled and manipulated. As these dictators conquer countries and take resources they become stronger:



A weak Germany was the reason the Nazi party stole power. However we are talking about Russia.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom