Ukraine Invasion - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar

Status
Not open for further replies.
but it doesn't make the pacifist the bad guys

Doesn't mean much if you are dead or slaves to a brutal regime.

Standing back and letting millions of people live under misery and oppression because of "good intentions" I don't really see that any different to the bad guys.
 
A general population that can't be mobilised to go off and fight in some far-away war isn't a bad thing.

I largely hope that younger generations all around the globe are increasingly pacifist. OK that might not apply to China... but even their general (civvy) population probably isn't thrilled by the prospect of taking up arms, and fighting for the party.

Plus we all know about the absolute horrors of war, and have seen it on our screens, and it's just not appealing.

Maybe the pacifists get their arse kicked by the warmongers, but it doesn't make the pacifist the bad guys, ultimately. Just means we're a pathetic species that never learns.

China has a huge population, true. The thing is, with the one child policy, a family line ends if their son dies. This is probably in the minds of the party there.

The problem with pacifism is that it's the long road to being someone else's boy. People will never change, and that means you have to make hard choices to keep safe.
 
Doesn't mean much if you are dead or slaves to a brutal regime.

Standing back and letting millions of people live under misery and oppression because of "good intentions" I don't really see that any different to the bad guys.
And yet, if everyone was a pacifist, it wouldn't be a problem. Obviously that is not the case, but it doesn't make pacifism wrong or immoral.
 
Different times! The mental fortitude of the newer generation leaves much to be desired.

Or they're simply more aware of that a bunch of charlatans are running the show and aren't prepared to sell their soul to kill on the orders of the rich and powerful.

Successive governments have fostered a society of everyone for themselves, especially if you have money and then they want all hands to the pump when the **** hits the fan? **** that.
 
Last edited:
Just a far off pie in the sky pipe-dream. Like a utopia that will never likely happen.
Of course, but you are (mostly) only responsible for your own actions. That others do not and will not follow suit is a problem, of course. But it's really, really hard to say that pacifism is morally wrong. Or to claim that pacifists are just as bad as warmongers.
 
Very much is a bad thing, I'd rather be the **** kicker if I'm being honest. Thats the kind of attitude we need to get rid of. Until we as a species is prepared to go on that journey together, human nature is human nature, dosnt matter how much we try, we keep reverting to form, and we need to be ahead of the curve unless as a nation we want to be just a moment in history.
Unless humans have a mass evolutionary shift in their base instincts in the not too distant future, we will always need ‘stout men to man the walls and protect the rest of us from barbarians’ EDIT: paraphrasing (badly iirc) a line from a movie (I think)
The lust for power and greed is just too strong for some to ignore so there will always be ‘bad men’ - if the rest of the world danced round these bad men waving flowers and telling them to be nice it would be a blood bath. Metaphorically and literally.
 
Last edited:
Or they're simply more aware of that a bunch of charlatans are running the show and aren't prepared to sell their soul to kill on the orders of the rich and powerful.

Successive governments have fostered a society of everyone for themselves, especially if you have money and then they want all hands to the pump when the **** hits the fan? **** that.
In the extreme, all that breeds is "**** That" in a different language with an unfriendly foreign government that cares less for you than the one that we have. Better the devil you know...

of course. But it's really, really hard to say that pacifism is morally wrong.
At best Pasificm is morally questionable. Not willing to make a stand for existence is the death of it. Seems ultimately defeatist.
 
Unless humans have a mass evolutionary shift in their base instincts in the not too distant future, we will always need ‘stout men to man the walls and protect the rest of us from barbarians’ EDIT: paraphrasing (badly iirc) a line from a movie (I think)
The lust for power and greed is just too strong for some to ignore so there will always be ‘bad men’ - if the rest of the world danced round these bad men waving flowers and telling them to be nice it would be a blood bath. Metaphorically and literally.
Sadly this is the reality we live and will be for the foreseeable future. We as a species is not all that advanced. Our tribal natures oozes out at every opportunity we give it.
Well, it seems there would no shortage of willing recruits here to go fight in whatever pointless war comes next.
I've done my share of "pointless" wars. I'd happily go forth in a situation where our nation requires. Not for "king or country" but for brothers left and right and for family, because ultimately thats what it comes down to. Precisely what Ukraine is fighting for right this moment.
 
I said it at the start of the thread and I’ll say it now, we should have nuked Russia from the start, made Japan 1945 look like a minor incident. For too long Russia has tried to bully and invaded its neighbours, they’ve killed on our shores, and they get away with it because everyone’s too cowardly to hold Russia and it’s people accountable for fear of starting WW3.

The reality is that a united show of force against Russia by the majority of the world would have ended things very quickly, and their retaliation would be as pathetic as their attempt to invade the poorest country in Europe.

We have messed up badly allowing the precedent of allowing Russia to push in our direction without immediately making them regret it. It was correct to nuke Japan, we would have Nuked Nazi Germany if we had the bomb on time, and we should be wiping Russia as we know it off the face of the earth.
 
I said it at the start of the thread and I’ll say it now, we should have nuked Russia from the start, made Japan 1945 look like a minor incident. For too long Russia has tried to bully and invaded its neighbours, they’ve killed on our shores, and they get away with it because everyone’s too cowardly to hold Russia and it’s people accountable for fear of starting WW3.

The reality is that a united show of force against Russia by the majority of the world would have ended things very quickly, and their retaliation would be as pathetic as their attempt to invade the poorest country in Europe.

We have messed up badly allowing the precedent of allowing Russia to push in our direction without immediately making them regret it. It was correct to nuke Japan, we would have Nuked Nazi Germany if we had the bomb on time, and we should be wiping Russia as we know it off the face of the earth.

Japan didn't have nuke's to retaliate with, Russia does.

Your "Genius Idea" to have nuked Russia first, is without a doubt, the dumbest, most moronic idea ever.

Unless your plan was to wipe out all civilization by having Russia launch every single one of their nukes in retaliation.
 
This war is only about Putin's legacy - a dying man going off on a period of madness to seal his glorious reign in the history books as the new "Vladimir the Great". I saw an article earlier this week how they have started putting books in Russian schools saying how Putin saved Russia from the west
 
Japan didn't have nuke's to retaliate with, Russia does.

Your "Genius Idea" to have nuked Russia first, is without a doubt, the dumbest, most moronic idea ever.

Unless your plan was to wipe out all civilization by having Russia launch every single one of their nukes in retaliation.

Hurfdurf is either on a wind up or furiously Googling how to make a nuclear bomb.
 
I said it at the start of the thread and I’ll say it now, we should have nuked Russia from the start, made Japan 1945 look like a minor incident. For too long Russia has tried to bully and invaded its neighbours, they’ve killed on our shores, and they get away with it because everyone’s too cowardly to hold Russia and it’s people accountable for fear of starting WW3.

The reality is that a united show of force against Russia by the majority of the world would have ended things very quickly, and their retaliation would be as pathetic as their attempt to invade the poorest country in Europe.

We have messed up badly allowing the precedent of allowing Russia to push in our direction without immediately making them regret it. It was correct to nuke Japan, we would have Nuked Nazi Germany if we had the bomb on time, and we should be wiping Russia as we know it off the face of the earth.

How to prove were the good guys, kill babies.
 
No verification of this, but apparently Americans are failing in their support for Ukraine. 55% now want to end support.

If that's true, if America does end support for Ukraine, then they will not get my vote of confidence again. It will be a graphic illustration of short-sighted selfishness. Mind you, it will be a wake-up call for Europe. It will send a very clear message that we can't rely on America any more. As they decline, the first casualty is their allies and their standing in the world.
 
Last edited:
No verification of this, but apparently Americans are failing in their support for Ukraine. 55% now want to end support.

If that's true, if America does end support for Ukraine, then they will not get my vote of confidence again. It will be a graphic illustration of short-sighted selfishness. Mind you, it will be a wake-up call for Europe. It will send a very clear message that we can't rely on America any more. As they decline, the first casualty is their allies and their standing in the world.
Read different re support.

Sounds like speculation to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom