Was reported yesterday, the Telegraph interviewed the doctor mentioned who couldn't confirm/deny anything as they only treated rioters who had been shot not the police.
Ukraine Invasion - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar
- Thread starter areksnumbr1sxylady
- Start date
- Status
Was reported yesterday, the Telegraph interviewed the doctor mentioned who couldn't confirm/deny anything as they only treated rioters who had been shot not the police.
It's a fact that the report acknowledges that both sides were building up their military assets in the disputed areas of Georgia prior to the war. It's also acknowledged that the pro-Russian South Ossetian rebels were also behind shelling attacks on Georgian villages prior to the shelling of Tskhinvali.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 13 Nov 2006
- Posts
- 5,798
Have you seen the video that seems to show the protesters getting shot from behind.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 37,804
- Location
- block 16, cell 12
If you only position snipers in front of your enemy instead of around them then you're doing it wrong.
Who's to say the Ukraine forces had not encircled the protesters?
- Joined
- 20 Nov 2011
- Posts
- 3,814
- Location
- Cambridge/Chicago
Most disturbing is that in all fairness, those who were shot and killed should have had a post death analysis on the bodies... Then it would provide substantial evidence to who shot those protesters and from what angles.
Apparently all bodies were quickly removed and disposed... Everyone keeps quiet about this idea...
Although, this might be a 2 way game.... Clearly something isnt clean...
- Joined
- 20 Nov 2011
- Posts
- 3,814
- Location
- Cambridge/Chicago
The whole idea is that for many weeks the government has kept its soldeirs un-armed completely.
Why all of the sudden they should start shooting at the crowd?? Everyone knew that this would be a suicide in the situation that was present....
At that point, the only way out was to only napalm the whole square.... Not shoot at 2-3 protesters causing a massive assault and outcry from whole world...
Doesnt seem sensible dont you think.
Yeah, I realised it was nonsense 30 seconds in, if you look closely the reflective metal shield has no bullet hole at the start yet after he gets "shot from behind" it has a hole blown out, an inward facing hole
(for anyone who doesn't understand, that means the shot came from the front not the back).
It's amazing when you think about how much time have we wasted discussing the sniper story, which actually boils down to just one Estonian politician's opinion from over a week ago who wasn't there during the shootings. On the other hand, how much time have we spent discussing the actions of the pro-Russian mob in Crimea regard UN envoy Robert Sherry and his resultant forced exit from Crimea? This mob seemed particularly well informed as to Sherry's visit, his whereabouts and his itinerary, it would appear that this mob was being controlled by someone, but who? and why wouldn't they want the UN in the Crimea?
Well to be fair that was always going to happen, with the new Ukrainian government issuing daily threats against Crimea and the locals seeing the Russians as protectors the was never going to be a warm response to a UN envoy. However I must admit I am surprised he was sent running for the hills so quickly lol.
One thing I do find funny is that when the Ukrainian police used violence against pro-EU protesters is was an OMG moment yet when they used force to evict a large number of pro-Russia protesters from a government building in Donetsk no news agency really cared. It was funny when the protesters then rallied outside building upped their numbers then stormed and re-took the building from the police lol.
One thing I do find funny is that when the Ukrainian police used violence against pro-EU protesters is was an OMG moment yet when they used force to evict a large number of pro-Russia protesters from a government building in Donetsk no news agency really cared. It was funny when the protesters then rallied outside building upped their numbers then stormed and re-took the building from the police lol.
Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Feb 2010
- Posts
- 5,210
- Location
- Southampton
it was OMG because they were shooting people - 77 dead? 600 wounded?
how many people were shot in Donetsk? - 0 ? 7 people wounded?
The anti gov protesters were all shot from behind their lines. All facing the 'enemy', or running away from the enemy, into the line of fire.
Watch the video, it really is quite obvious that it was an inside job by the thugs trying to topple the government. If not, why such radio silence from ALL THE WESTERN MEDIA OUTLETS???
Why has Catherine Ashton refused to comment on the leaked phone call? (By the way her 'Oh my gosh!' comment was so contrived, of course she knew already).
First Syria with the chem weapons fakery, and now this. It seems the US will stop at nothing to push its zionist agenda.
First they tried to get straight to Syria. Now they realise they must weaken russia, to have a chance at regime change in Syria and Iran.
Why are they rushing so quickly, bungling all their poorly laid plans?
Because China is about 7-10 years away from military dominance, with an economic growth rate >7% compared to the dying US economy propped up by a war thirsty petrodollar.
Last edited:
People were raving about it long before that day.
So you think violence against protesters is fine as long as they have different views to us?
Watch it yourself, the first guy is clearly shot from the front, unless like the makers of the video you think the bullet came from behind and through the shield while making a hole which bends inwards (hint: not possible).
Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Feb 2010
- Posts
- 5,210
- Location
- Southampton
lol
my point was just that the two events are not very comparable on the international media OMG scale
You are mistaken, the guy is clearly shot from the side, from sniper position 2
Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Feb 2010
- Posts
- 5,210
- Location
- Southampton
you trippin son
What part does someone get shot from behind on that video? Some scenes show people getting shot from the front, and other scenes are inconclusive because of the low resolution.
State the time in the video where's it's "obvious" and I will take another look.
The direction is not in dispute, the video actually draws a line depicting the trajectory, the issue is that the video says the bullet came from behind when it shows it coming from the front.
It's kind of scary that somebody can make a video and add in annotations that tell the viewer they are seeing the opposite to what they are and then some people actually believe it.
Thirty seconds in it shows a side view of a guy with a shield who gets shot through from the front (though the video says it was from the back lol).
Hmm, maybe Vladimir Putin is right, sometimes freedom of speech is a bad thing.
Let me explain something that you haven't managed to grasp. The back, is the side which the person is not shielding. That shot, thirty seconds in, is from the back relative to the target. Why you keep saying it is from the front is completely beyond me.
- Status