Soldato
Easy to see why he is leaving is it not.
Yeah, Mercedes have been bullet-proof.
Easy to see why he is leaving is it not.
If mclaren would have got it right Lewis would be at least 20 points in the lead now.
Easy to see why he is leaving is it not.
Do these last 2 races not count then?
So McLarens screw ups are worth over 100 points? How did you work that out? Don't forget that removing bad luck puts Vettel at least 25 points further up than he is now too, meaning Hamilton would be needing 5 race wins at events he actually scored zero at...
It's very easy to work out have a go
Off hand I can think of 3 races he would have won if Mclaren had not messed up.
I think he was going by the James Allen article?
http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2012/...nd-the-title-slipped-away-for-lewis-hamilton/
Alonso, marginally.
But as I said, you can't just remove bad luck from 1 driver. If you remove the bad luck from Alonso and Vettel too they would still be ahead.
I think he was going by the James Allen article?
http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2012/...nd-the-title-slipped-away-for-lewis-hamilton/
why are so many people saying Hamilton on driving alone, if it was driving alone then theres far more deserving drivers like kimi.
Their DNFs didn't gift Hamilton many points did they?
Where as Hamilton's gave a first and 2 seconds to title leaders. It's one thing to equalise the luck, but in the interest of accuracy the consideration should extend to the altered points distribution caused by the misfortune.
Then it does start to make your head spin, you lose interest in the pedantry of calculating how much the team has let Lewis down and take the season at face value, as a competitive and exciting one.
Back OnT, it's a close call but I think Alonso sneaks it. He has dragged that car beyond where it should be.
why are so many people saying Hamilton on driving alone, if it was driving alone then theres far more deserving drivers like kimi.
I have no proof of this this video is lap 50 or 51 at India where I seem to recall the car looking close to the ground (compared to other cars) and scraping the track surface but not just india (where iirc Vettal picked up damage) but at the later stages of other races this year and also during qualifying.
It does to me seem odd that a car thats close to 150KG lighter during qualifying and the later stages of races can be so close to the track surface without something altering geometry as surely setup with non-moveable suspension geometry rules requires the car be setup as close to the ground as possible when fully laden with fuel (so maybe sparks at the beginning of races) but the car should rise gradually as the fuel load goes down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pw3kXiXhzUI
Also found this which althuugh the quotes are from 2010 does beg the question maybe they never removed it and simply hid the operating mechanism as Ferrari and iirc McLaren have again questioned RB's ride height during this season.
Another thought is maybe Newry has devised some sort of clever suspension that while totally mechanical and non driver adjustable alters itself depending on the weight of the car