Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 33,188
This was uncalled for, surely?
Why is it uncalled for, someone maliciously stamped ON HIS FACE, as he said, centimetre's from his eye, what exactly would have happened had a stud pushed down on his eye. It was a really disgusting challenge and really looked without question on purpose. As said his direction and momentum were all taking him one way and he moved his leg in a non natural direction and really obviously put his foot through the stamp.
Why is it uncalled for to make a very well worded statement about it? Should he simply never have mentioned being assaulted on the pitch, do you not think reporters would ask him about it.
Please explain whats wrong with him talking about what happened?
He really should get a long ban for it, frankly he seemed without question to have it in for his old team mates and the fans, the celebration was clearly planed and that stamp was simply disgraceful.
Honestly I really can't think of another stamp/attack that bad since Keano's revenge leg breaking. Theres been poor tackles, the tackle on Eduardo was terrible but was mistimed, completely unintentional and there was no hint of revenge or hatred between the players.
If he doesn't get at the very least, a standard red card ban applied by the FA its a joke, but realistically he should get an extended ban of several games.