-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
What do gamers actually think about Ray-Tracing?
- Thread starter Purgatory
- Start date
Man of Honour
It's just my gateway to 40" ultrawide at 5120x2160, can then hawk tuah at basic 4K 
Man of Honour
When it comes to visuals, cost is trivial if the item meets the reqs
Caporegime
Posted as a separate post so not to mess up other useful threads regarding ray tracing.
Worth completing this HUB survey too if you have a minute, it's part of the above video and link is also in the description area too and below here.
SURVEY: https://forms.gle/u43Pa7wEt63nZwSH7
I do wonder once the new generation of cards drops how much this ratio will change next year? Going to be very dependent on how well the sub £500 cards perform. If the RTX5060 and RX8600 end up being potatoes like the current ones,think there still be this big divide between enthusiasts on forums and gaming plebs in general. If they can't match an RTX4070/RX7800XT at under £350 it is going to be quite amusing to watch. We won't be worrying about 4K,it will be 720p Master Race upscaled to 1080p Ultimate Resolution - sure @TNA will approve!
Also,how is the lack of puddles this week for everyone? Terrible lack of reflections.
Last edited:
Really hope the 40" ultrawide is very expensive. Then we can see how creative the excuses will be
It's more immersive, its more efficient desk space, um you see ultrawide IRL.
Edit: Just realised my GPU is now 1.5 years old, basically EOL now.
Last edited:
Yup, having switched to try out a 4k qd-oled monitor, dlss works stupidly well, even ultra perf. looks better than dlss quality at 3440x1440
Sure in motion, there are issues with things like foilage and power lines but on the whole, the experience is incredible and as evidenced by mrks comparisons, this is far better than native 4k raster.
Last edited:
Man of Honour
Oi oi, my screens are DLSS Performance, not Ultra Performance In motion it's nigh on perfect vs DLSS Quality at 3440x1440
In motion it's nigh on perfect vs DLSS Quality at 3440x1440 Oi oi, my screens are DLSS Performance, not Ultra Performance
Yes performance is noticeably better for motion temporal stability stuff and reconstruction but not all of us have a 4090
Man of Honour
It's about time to get one, it is now safe to upgrade.
Yes performance is noticeably better for motion temporal stability stuff and reconstruction but not all of us have a 4090
mrk will be offloading his very shortly, check the MM for a bargain when the new cards are out.
Man of Honour
Cyberpunk 2077 2024.07.20 - 01.33.37.02.mp4
drive.google.com
Download and watch at 120fps since youtube only plays back at 60, 4K PT with DLSS 3.7 Performance is the nuts
Man, I am trying to get away from 1440p.. This guy is content and championing 1080p
Welcome to the nuanced world of PC. It's called having a preferenceMan, I am trying to get away from 1440p.. This guy is content and championing 1080p
, you know the entire core of actually caring about PC. I know we are all suppose to believe the same but the real world is certainly not set up this way no matter what the usual suspects would have us believe Me for example, don't care that much about RT at this point in time, so many things comes before it in my own opinion. It's like 6th or so on my list of things atm.
Welcome to the nuanced world of PC. It's called having a preference
Me for example, don't care that much about RT at this point in time, so many things comes before it in my own opinion. It's like 6th or so on my list of things atm.
Not sure where I suggested otherwise?
I stated my preference wrapped around a joke. I never suggested it should be at the top of everyone's list. Lol.
So basically you don't care about better visuals at the moment then because that is what it really comes down to (which is fine btw)
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Aug 2009
- Posts
- 3,155
The ratio basically dictates the DLSS setting applied: Quality (0.6666667), Balanced (0.58), Performance (0.5), Ultra Perofmrnace (0.366666) or thereabouts. It does work for me.
For that screenshot I had a ratio of 0.46 I think and RR was On. DLSS 3.7.1.
Well, it doesv(almost) everything I need, especially at 3x1080 ... > 4k for me.Man, I am trying to get away from 1440p.. This guy is content and championing 1080p
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 May 2007
- Posts
- 10,158
Cyberpunk 2077 2024.07.20 - 01.33.37.02.mp4
Download and watch at 120fps since youtube only plays back at 60, 4K PT with DLSS 3.7 Performance is the nuts
You better watch out. One more play through of that game and somebody on here will phone the priory and get you booked in. Your addiction to shiny puddles is getting a bit worrying.