12GB is going to be the new 10GB in 2023
Already is, Portal RTX requires over 12gb vram
4070ti just launched and Nvidia is already trying to kill it
Last edited:
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
12GB is going to be the new 10GB in 2023
They want people to buy the RTX 4080. If the RTX 4070 TI had 16GB it might put some people off the 4080.Already is, Portal RTX requires over 12gb vram
4070ti just launched and Nvidia is already trying to kill it
Not sure about anyone else, but I personally wish it had 10GBAlready is, Portal RTX requires over 12gb vram
4070ti just launched and Nvidia is already trying to kill it
at what resolution ?Already is, Portal RTX requires over 12gb vram
4070ti just launched and Nvidia is already trying to kill it
Nice analysis, as you’ve discovered it’s completely wasted on our green friends.7900XT ? no, its not that type of design to hit 599 GBP. It (7900XT) was never designed to hit that type of price target, it was designed to take the chips that don't make the grade for the 7900XTX but the actual reference PCB card, bus and Vram specification puts in a tight spot bill-of-materials wise to cut retail price toe-to-toe with the 4070ti.
The problem is that the regular Joe's don't know what they are buying, they just see the Nvidia badge and DLSS 3.0 sprayed on a box.
The 4070ti design, allows it to be a cheap card.
Here is a near reference 4070ti PNY, it has 9+2 PCB phases (https://www.techpowerup.com/review/pny-geforce-rtx-4070-ti-oc/4.html). This is roughly in line with the PCB quality of the 2070 Super which, had a 256bit bus width and 8GB Vram.
The 4070ti has 12GB Vram with a 192bit bus that permanently cripples the card.
This is a reference 7900XT, look at the quality of the engineering in comparison to the PNY 4070ti, it has 14+3 phases with 70 amp rated components.
The 6800XT was 12+3, the 6900XT was 16+3, so its somewhere between the two in terms of PCB but the 7900XT has 20gb vram and 384-bit bus.
In terms of historical context, one of the best made cards I ever handled was an EVGA 1080 Classified, that card had 14+3 phases with a 256bit bus, it weighed a ton, had dual fans and cost 700 USD in 2016. That is about 750 GBP inc. Vat now. That is the level of engineering that the 7900XT reference PCB has.
Therefore, the 'real' price for the 7900XT reference is probably somewhere between 700-800 GBP inc Vat. The real price for the 4070ti reference should be in the 450-500 GBP range, maybe lower, they are just two different cards at an *engineering* level, regardless of what the graphs say. The 7900XT is just a class above the 4070ti.
Nice analysis, as you’ve discovered it’s completely wasted on our green friends.
AMD told us the 7900XTX is an 80 competitor and traditionally 80 products sell in the 600-700 range so I think £800 would be about right for this card and around the same for the 4080.Therefore, the 'real' price for the 7900XT reference is probably somewhere between 700-800 GBP inc Vat. The real price for the 4070ti reference should be in the 450-500 GBP range
Despite all that high tech AMD precision engineering and top quality "military grade" components, the 4070ti performs better, with lower power draw, lower temps, lower noise, stable drivers, working coolers, better raytracing, DLSS 3, RTX Voice, Gsync, Nvidia Reflex low latency and broadcast streaming features all for a bill of materials costing £300 less. Well done Nvidia !
You can buy replacement fans cheap from China or even just deshroud and strap a couple of arctic P12s. On a GPU a failed cooler is the least of your worries.It is, because of cooler failure. I'd guess the risk is a bit lower with founders edition cards.
And power too.. and sometimes waterBecause ultimately in the end none of it really matters. Price and performance in games is what counts. The above is just a bonus.
Your options are to buy used, skip a gen, buy a console or Jensen's personal favourite bend over.
The problem is buying something like a used 3080 still costs around £600. I thing we’d all accept that the 4070ti is a slightly faster, more efficient and better featured card. so unless you can buy a 3060 for £200-300 or something substantially cheaper than a 3080/4070ti from what I can see there aren’t really any better options.
I do accept we’re being screwed for what a couple of years ago would be a £500 card but we can only go with the options we have just now in 2023!
My choice these past few years has been to Game on console as I don’t particularly want to spend £1000 on a GPU! However for some people that’s not an option depending on the games/apps they want to run. You can say just don’t buy it but many will have put off or been unable to buy a GPU this past generation and are still running older hardware that is no longer minimum spec for modern apps.
A 3090 went on MM for £600 yesterday which is around the same 4k perf as a 4070ti with double the VRAM.The problem is buying something like a used 3080 still costs around £600. I thing we’d all accept that the 4070ti is a slightly faster, more efficient and better featured card. so unless you can buy a 3060 for £200-300 or something substantially cheaper than a 3080/4070ti from what I can see there aren’t really any better options.
I do accept we’re being screwed for what a couple of years ago would be a £500 card but we can only go with the options we have just now in 2023!
My choice these past few years has been to Game on console as I don’t particularly want to spend £1000 on a GPU! However for some people that’s not an option depending on the games/apps they want to run. You can say just don’t buy it but many will have put off or been unable to buy a GPU this past generation and are still running older hardware that is no longer minimum spec for modern apps.
Without frame generation, which does seem to be worthwhile.A 3090 went on MM for £600 yesterday which is around the same 4k perf as a 4070ti with double the VRAM.
I personally wouldn't pay £250 extra for half the VRAM + frame generation, how many games currently use FG?Without frame generation, which does seem to be worthwhile.
Without frame generation, which does seem to be worthwhile.
Not sure about anyone else, but I personally wish it had 10GB
I personally wouldn't pay £250 extra for half the VRAM + frame generation, how many games currently use FG?
I think I'm just gonna buy an RX 6800 XT from CEX, once the price has fallen to £500 (not far off now). The inventory seems low atm though.
Or get a Navi32 GPU when they decide to compete with Nvidia.
Nope, this was definitely something I planned, as a stopgap to play at 1080p (only cost £140). I'm going to sell it on anyway.If you have just bought a vega the advice is to stop buying stuff without a plan. There has been plenty of opportunities in the past two years to offload old hardware while it was easy money to offset a new gpu.