• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

What do you think of the 4070Ti?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 251651
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Is the 4070ti selling any better though. I highly doubt it as it's no better hence the price fixing. I would buy the xt over the ti. I would say both companies don't really want you to buy any of them though as the higher cards look a better buy.

Every advice I have seen, even on the street, is don't buy the 4070ti. The real question is - how many people don't ask for advice and will buy it anyway?
 
Every advice I have seen, even on the street, is don't buy the 4070ti. The real question is - how many people don't ask for advice and will buy it anyway?
The trouble is the advice is also not to buy a 4080 or 7900 XT, which only leaves you with 2 options.

We don't know how well the 4070 Ti is selling compared to the AMD cards. It looked like the AMD cards were selling well, but then there were only like 100 cards for all of Europe so it's not surprising they sold out of most of them. If the 4070 Ti stocks are better then more might have been sold but places still have stock.
 
There's so much wishful thinking about prices in this thread.

The prices aren't going to fall. Nvidia doesn't do that (e.g. lower MSRP).

The exception was relaunching the RTX 4080 12GB as the RTX 4070 TI and lowering the price by £100. Not a massive cut.

The best you can hope for is better priced mid tier cards in the RTX 4000 series. But they aren't rushing to announce them, are they?

The people that are complaining the most loudly though, are people already unhappy with the RTX 4070 TIs performance, so a lower tier GPU isn't going to please them.

I seem to remember that the last time NVIDIA got it badly wrong they only corrected it the on the next generation. People hoping for a price reduction of any consequence may be waiting another two years!!
 
There's so much wishful thinking about prices in this thread.

The prices aren't going to fall. Nvidia doesn't do that (e.g. lower MSRP).

The exception was relaunching the RTX 4080 12GB as the RTX 4070 TI and lowering the price by £100. Not a massive cut.

The best you can hope for is better priced mid tier cards in the RTX 4000 series. But they aren't rushing to announce them, are they?

The people that are complaining the most loudly though, are people already unhappy with the RTX 4070 TIs performance, so a lower tier GPU isn't going to please them.

3090Ti has entered the chat.
 
The less you buy the more they cost :cry:

Therealdeal would agree. Poor lad still on a Vega 64 and keeps waiting for good guy AMD to release a card that is priced in a way that does not take the ****.

waiting-for-help-waiting.gif
 
So the source for the information regarding new AD104 GPUs seems be this:

It mentions two GPU dies, AD104-250 and AD104-251. Production is speculated to begin in about 1 month.

It doesn't really confirm any spec details, just mentions some previous possibilities / rumours.

Judging by the block diagram, if a whole group of cores (GPC) is disabled/ not included, you'd expect a GPU die with 80% of the cores of the RTX 4070 TI, so a total of 6,144 shading units.

In terms of the floating point performance, it would be ~32 TFlops assuming a clockrate of 2610 Mhz (if same clockrate as the 4070 TI).

Or, 30.7 TFlops, assuming a clockrate of 2500 Mhz. So (only in theory), either would be a little ahead of an RTX 3080 10GB in theoretical performance.

So, not sure the specs on WCCFtech add up (or are just more pessimistic).
 
Last edited:
I seem to remember that the last time NVIDIA got it badly wrong they only corrected it the on the next generation. People hoping for a price reduction of any consequence may be waiting another two years!!
They won't explicitly lower MSRP, but can lower actual costs which helps IHVs lower their costs. They can also create games packages etc.


But these pricing arguments are boring, they happen every release and the same people saying Nvidia is killing PC gaming make the same retarded statements that are shown to be false every release.

Yes, the prices seem absurd to me, but Nvidia sets prices to maximize total profits, not revenue or market share. And Nvidia can only set a price point that the market supports, this is economics 101. Nvidia and AMD are not charities, and GPUs are not a basic human right, so their is zero legal nor moral ground for purposely reducing profits. In fact, doing so would actually have potential legal issues because as both companies are publicly traded, then their main legal responsibility is to maximize returns for shareholders (within this are legal and moral responsibility to workers, the environment etc). But as a consumer of a luxury product aimed for the worlds richest people, you either suck up to their pricing, or buy a console.
 
The people that are complaining the most loudly though, are people already unhappy with the RTX 4070 TIs performance, so a lower tier GPU isn't going to please them.
Those ain't the complaints I've been hearing, in fact the performance of all the 40 series cards are good, it's the prices that are the problem. A 200% increase in performance between 10 and 40 series cards is great but when that performance increase comes with a 200% increase in price it's largely pointless.
 
People should avoid the RTX 4070 TI unless they can comfortably afford one, because there is no founders edition, and really no good reason not to have one.

Apparently, they have plenty of stock relative to higher teir cards, so why not have one?
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
The most disappointing thing about the 4070Ti and 4080 is.. .that Gibbo hasn't built a huge "box pyramid". Looking at the OCUK Nvidia page, he's even got enough 4090s left over to finish the job.

It could've been the biggest and longest serving graphics card pyramid in a long time. Surely got to be more fun than simply staring at them sat on the shelves all day. :)
 
They won't explicitly lower MSRP, but can lower actual costs which helps IHVs lower their costs. They can also create games packages etc.


But these pricing arguments are boring, they happen every release and the same people saying Nvidia is killing PC gaming make the same retarded statements that are shown to be false every release.

Yes, the prices seem absurd to me, but Nvidia sets prices to maximize total profits, not revenue or market share. And Nvidia can only set a price point that the market supports, this is economics 101. Nvidia and AMD are not charities, and GPUs are not a basic human right, so their is zero legal nor moral ground for purposely reducing profits. In fact, doing so would actually have potential legal issues because as both companies are publicly traded, then their main legal responsibility is to maximize returns for shareholders (within this are legal and moral responsibility to workers, the environment etc). But as a consumer of a luxury product aimed for the worlds richest people, you either suck up to their pricing, or buy a console.
I can't afford to be a PC gamer any more but as long as the shareholders are happy long live capitalism I guess.
 
But these pricing arguments are boring, they happen every release and the same people saying Nvidia is killing PC gaming make the same retarded statements that are shown to be false every release.
Prices generally trend up but this gen its different as the level of the increase is obscene and unprecedented and results in almost double the increase in one generation compared to what we've seen in the 10 years before that so its not surprising people are kicking off.

Screenshot-372.png
 
Prices generally trend up but this gen its different as the level of the increase is obscene and unprecedented and results in almost double the increase in one generation compared to what we've seen in the 10 years before that so its not surprising people are kicking off.

Screenshot-372.png
Remember a 580 was really the full blown chip too, after the 580 all chips were not what they should have been by the old naming.


Even the 3080 was a cut down large chip not the full chip. Since the 580 we have not been given a real 80 class that use to be the full blown chip and best card you could buy.
 
How is 12GB fine?, the card is choking @4k and in certain RT scenarios too. This is due to limited Vram and Bandwidth. Are you trying to tell me that someone paying £900-£1050 for a 4070ti is meant to accept that their card cannot perform as well at 4k as cards from 2 years ago?
Surely if the card were choking like you're saying then you could show us some frametime graphs to illustrate that problem. Furthermore you're confused about what the comparison should be, because the cards are judged in relation to each other as they are available and not some random selection of 5 cheap 3090/Ti's that you found on ebay one time. So when you look at the 4070 Ti, it's not just about what the card itself can do but also what it can do as compared to AMD's equivalents (near-cost), which when it comes to RT it gives the 7900XT and even the XTX a right spanking. Finally, this is NOT a 4K card if what we mean by 4K is rendering all 8.3 million pixels rather than using it with something like DLSS Performance etc. The reality is no GPU is really a true 4K card except maybe the 4090 and even then as soon as you count RT you really should still turn on DLSS. So when DLSS is taken into account then it turns out that 12 GB is enough for playing at "4K" even with all the RT goodies turned on.

Now, whether this type of performance is worth $900+ is up to the buyer, but ultimately if you do want this level of performance you're not going to find it cheaper, so complaining about it is pointless. Companies respond to sales numbers, not # of forum posts whinging about price, and as of right now we don't know how well/badly these cards have been received.

oZ4joHc.jpg pn5l63u.jpg
 
Capitalism is about the individual's own margins. It's totally capitalistic for a consumer to think of their own margins by wanting to pay less.

It is socialism where we exist to prop up private foreign companies like charities such as Nvidia and AMD who get massive tax incentives from the US taxpayer already. Nvidia didn't pay any Federal taxes in 2018 for example:

In the USSR, consumers existed as charities to prop up companies and were forced to buy overpriced and subpar consumer products.

We as consumers don't exist as charities. Nvidia, Intel and AMD are not even British firms and hardly contribute to the UK tax base or economy. So for the poor techno socialists here whether they make not enough profit that is not our problem. Other companies will eventually fill the void.

The techno socialists in this thread, if you are so support these companies, donate money to them from bank accounts if you feel sorry for them.Don't expect others to care. People don't walk into their Tesco and ponder whether Tesco is making enough money, if they decide to shop at Lidl instead.

There are huge online money saving communities like HUKD,etc dedicated to getting deals worldwide. People rush to sales in shops. People like to pay less of they could to increase their own margins.

Some of you are really are in some disjointed form of reality.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GAC
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom