Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Jul 2005
- Posts
- 20,707
- Location
- Officially least sunny location -Ronskistats
The ones currently predicted to have an $899 msrp.
But post scalper/retailer £££ prices?
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
The ones currently predicted to have an $899 msrp.
£100-200 behind a 4080 probablyBut post scalper/retailer £££ prices?
Predicated! So not known then.The ones currently predicted to have an $899 msrp.
We don’t have long to wait at least.Predicated! So not known then.
A 6700 XT will still give you perhaps 80% of the perf you see in my BF1 video at native 1440P so long as your CPU is pretty fast (5800X with 6900 XT)Right now the RX6700XT seems the best choice at a sane price, sadly we're talking about old tech by now...
Have you tried turning TAA off and using VSR?A 6700 XT will still give you perhaps 80% of the perf you see in my BF1 video at native 1440P so long as your CPU is pretty fast (5800X with 6900 XT)
- YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.www.youtube.com
I do increase the internal render res to a final res of just above 4K and use the 6900 XT's full capability as I was trying to fix the slight smudged visuals that TAA gives but it was no better with it off.
I can give that a go!Have you tried turning TAA off and using VSR?
It doesn't need collusion - it can happen naturally in any market where there are only 2 or 3 participants.I've said it before but in my opinion i suspect they're clouding to fix prices, obviously i have zero evidence other than how both of them have pushed prices up and AMD always seem to be within £100-200 of Nvidia's raster performance equivalent card.
All true and like i said it's only a personal opinion, what you said is certainly possible and I'd be inclined to think the same if they hadn't settled out of court in the past for collusion and prices just happened to align for a short while.Doesn't mean they aren't colluding, but your observation doesn't require collusion to come about.
Right now the RX6700XT seems the best choice at a sane price, sadly we're talking about old tech by now...
Its obvious that while we were all kept guessing about the performance of AMDs cards Nvidia knew exactly where they would land else they wouldn't have priced the 4080 so high.It doesn't need collusion - it can happen naturally in any market where there are only 2 or 3 participants.
In this case it's clear Nvidia can set the market price as they have a commanding position and enough customers who will buy almost irrespective of price - as you said they are just competing with themselves.
AMD only need to wait until after Nvidia have released their cards and they have all the information they need to set the price of their own products without any agreement, back room deals or even nods or winks.
Doesn't mean they aren't colluding, but your observation doesn't require collusion to come about.
It doesn't need collusion - it can happen naturally in any market where there are only 2 or 3 participants.
In this case it's clear Nvidia can set the market price as they have a commanding position and enough customers who will buy almost irrespective of price - as you said they are just competing with themselves.
AMD only need to wait until after Nvidia have released their cards and they have all the information they need to set the price of their own products without any agreement, back room deals or even nods or winks.
Doesn't mean they aren't colluding, but your observation doesn't require collusion to come about.
Yes I agree, 6700XT is possibly your best bang for buck, 12GB version will run most games very well at 1440p, plus Sapphire make nice cards, if I needed a GPU it's what I would be getting.
You get out of here with your logic and reason.It doesn't need collusion - it can happen naturally in any market where there are only 2 or 3 participants.
In this case it's clear Nvidia can set the market price as they have a commanding position and enough customers who will buy almost irrespective of price - as you said they are just competing with themselves.
AMD only need to wait until after Nvidia have released their cards and they have all the information they need to set the price of their own products without any agreement, back room deals or even nods or winks.
Doesn't mean they aren't colluding, but your observation doesn't require collusion to come about.
so, whens this due to happen againConsidering there's rumours of a imminent price cut on 4080's due to them sitting on shelves i think you maybe a little premature.
Last month.so, whens this due to happen again
competitor named which as VideoCardz reports, has reduced the Palit RTX 4080 GameRock to £1,099.99,
Tell that to all the outlets who reported it.There was no price cut. The reduction was due to the change in exchange rates.