Man of Honour
[..]
No it's really not. I understand why you think that based on how you view what getting married means, but that is where you go wrong.
Getting married is two people standing up in front of all their friends and family and telling them that they are committing themselves whole-heartedly to that person.
You can do that without getting married.
You can get married without doing that.
Therefore marriage is not that. That's one of the places where you go wrong.
Until you are married walking away from that person is easy, by getting married you are putting barriers in between yourself and splitting up showing that you have no intention of ever doing so. When you're married you're essentially one person to the outside world - the Angilion's.
I reject the idea that a married couple should be treated as essentially one person. That was Norman law, and it caused no end of injustice, especially for women.
Marriage does not constitute a massive commitment unless it is impossible or very difficult to get a divorce or annulment. Co-buying a house is perhaps more of a commitment nowadays.
I question the wisdom of forcing people to stay together when it makes them unhappy. That's essentially what commitment is in this context - a requirement to stay together whatever happens. Not staying together because you both want to - that doesn't require the binding together you are talking about or the denial of individuality you are talking about. Commitment like that only becomes relevant when you want to leave the relationship.
By both giving up a part of your individual persona, in the hope of creating something better, you are saying that this person is now part of who you are, not just a nice add-on like a coat that'll you'll throw away when it's out of fashion.
It is possible to do that without getting married.
It is possible to get married without doing that.
Therefore marriage is not that.
To put it ultra-simplistically, after however many years, if you're not willing (let alone wanting with every fibre of your body) to stand up in front of your friends and family and tell them 'actually this isn't just a short-term thing, I want to be with this person forever and I'm very proud to be able to say that' then they're probably not the right person for you.[..]
My sister has been with her man for almost 30 years. They co-own a house. They have a son. They are happily content together. Friends and family know very well they intend to be together for life. They're not just saying so - three decades say they mean it.
They aren't married.
Do you really consider that to be a short-term relationship that will be discarded as casually as an old coat?
Really?