GordyR said:There is no such thing as muscle "tone". Thats just down to low body fat again. If you got down to 7% bodyfat I think you would be surprised just how similar your physique would look to his.
I think his point is that "muscle tone" is a neurological quantity and not something you can train or improve (well you can if you are either side of normal tone, trying to deviate from that though isn't a good idea), if you want your muscles to look better and more defined you reduce the amount of fat on them.cleanbluesky said:Its not just low body fat - the way in which the muscle hangs depends on the amount of residual tension in the muscle - if someone suffers from hypertonia they are unable to relax their muscles - hence the concept of tone @ rest...
How would you explain saggy muscles if there is no such thing as tone?
With down-lighting I do look fairly similar to him now - I have 10% bodyfat, good tone and defined muscles... but you need all three I would say, uncluding favourable lighting
Vegeta said:This may sound like a stupid ass question but how do you measuure your body fat %'age
although he does look good in clothes..
Bit of a childish comment.zain said:
Seriously? Would you like to expand on that a little? I could understand someone saying that to a pic of coleman due to his freakish size/look, but I really can't see what is offensive about the look steve reeves had.zain said:

Jagen said:but I really can't see what is offensive about the look steve reeves had.

Yeh, free anabolic steroids, those where the days. None of this creatine crap.NitrogenY3K said:This is a fantasic phisique: none of theis brad pitt noncence![]()
![]()
snip


Yeh, back when he was ~15 he was able to get them for free, the doctor would give em to him, in the form of injections afaik. These H&S restrictions are annoying tbh.NitrogenY3K said:Well dunno about free but they were legal![]()