Just so I can get this question out of my head, can I ask. Are you quite well off haggis man? I can't shake that feeling lol.
Haha, far from it
I drive a 10 year old banger, rarely go out because we can't afford it, we're having our first holiday for 3 years next week, which consists of a week in Wales where we're staying for free in my boss's holiday bungalow, so only have to pay for petrol and food, and the first time I've bought myself a "treat" in the last few years was buying a second hand PC a couple of months ago for about £200
I don't moan though, because I'm in this position by choice. I've prioritised a job I enjoy and spending time with my family, over hating my job or working every hour under the sun just for money.
Do I "want" for more...? I wouldn't say no, but I wouldn't sacrifice my principles or what I've got for it.
Do you think everybody can have a decent job?.
No, but I think everyone should aspire to one.
What about things which need doing in large numbers but are not desirable?, how do you reconcile the limited quantity of good jobs?.
If you can't find a good job, make one
Start your own company, and be the boss.
If it was that simple & adversity drove positive behaviour then why does it seem the opposite globally?, when comparing crime, engagement & social interactions the nations which are the most generous tend to have the least problems & those who are the least the most.
Because on the whole, people are self-destructive. Throwing money at the problem (i.e. "distribution of wealth") only treats the symptoms, not the cause. People's attitudes need to change on a global scale, at both ends of the spectrum.
The greedy (some rich are greedy, but not all, some greedy are rich, but not all), need to stop being so greedy, and those who are unhappy with their lot in life need to realise that if they want something to change, it's their responsibility, not someone else's.