Wikileaks to release Hillary documents

tang0 · 22 Oct 2017 at 19:02

It's amazing how things at the justice department can get covered up when you're not in power

hornetstinger · 22 Oct 2017 at 19:06

tang0 said:
It's amazing how things at the justice department can get covered up when you're not in power

What are you blathering about?

Raymond Lin · 22 Oct 2017 at 19:07

tang0 said:
Jimmy Carter - "I don’t think there’s any evidence that what the Russians did changed enough votes — or any votes,"

http://www.dailywire.com/news/22585/jimmy-carter-unleashed-russians-didnt-alter-joseph-curl

Understand information fail.

The investigation isn't about whether Russian interference affected the voting or disputing the result of the election. Nobody is disputing that except Trump supporters. You forgot about the committee Trump set up to look into electrical fraud already?

The investigation is about whether Trump and his campaign colluded with the Russians.

I notice you have a problem understanding, in general.

You don't understand the meaning of hearsay. You don't understand the meaning of a conviction and what criminal means and you don't understand what is hypocrisy.

Raymond Lin · 22 Oct 2017 at 19:09

tang0 said:
It's amazing how things at the justice department can get covered up when you're not in power

What do you call 9 republican lead investigations?

VincentHanna · 22 Oct 2017 at 19:11

tang0 said:
It's amazing how things at the justice department can get covered up when you're not in power

Well now that they [Republicans] are in power, wouldn't this have come to light straight away when they took over?

Yas786 · 22 Oct 2017 at 19:26

tang0 said:
Jimmy Carter - "I don’t think there’s any evidence that what the Russians did changed enough votes — or any votes,"

http://www.dailywire.com/news/22585/jimmy-carter-unleashed-russians-didnt-alter-joseph-curl

Meh Carter can talk, he was hardly a beacon of shining light during his Presidency.

Old senile fool talking about things he clearly knows nothing about :/.

IronWarrior · 22 Oct 2017 at 19:48

Diddums said:
Nobody can read that. Also, post actual sources.

Sources are in the bottom of the picture.

Raymond Lin said:
Are we resorting to just posting random screenshot where you can't see anything?

Can't see anything, can't read? Didn't CNN (very fake news) give you permission to read it?

oh no, that sucks.

Raymond Lin · 22 Oct 2017 at 19:52

IronWarrior said:
Sources are in the bottom of the picture.

Can't see anything, can't read? Didn't CNN (very fake news) give you permission to read it?

oh no, that sucks.

Somebody wasn't here when he posted a thumbnail.

FAIL.

Diddums · 22 Oct 2017 at 19:53

IronWarrior said:
Sources are in the bottom of the picture.

He changed the picture luckily.

IronWarrior · 22 Oct 2017 at 19:55

Raymond Lin said:
Somebody wasn't here when he posted a thumbnail.

FAIL.

Doesn't change the fact, that you not allowed to read it and I doubt you would read it, doubt you will even type in the urls listed, doubt you ever read any wikisleaks or even visited the site.

Raymond Lin · 22 Oct 2017 at 20:03

IronWarrior said:
Doesn't change the fact, that you not allowed to read it and I doubt you would read it, doubt you will even type in the urls listed, doubt you ever read any wikisleaks or even visited the site.

The fact that he posted a thumbnail and we pointed out his error and you assumed wrong?

That's a fact.

I've read about of wiki leaks pages, so you are wrong there too.

I notice you and tang0 are wrong a lot.

IronWarrior · 22 Oct 2017 at 20:08

Raymond Lin said:
The fact that he posted a thumbnail and we pointed out his error and you assumed wrong?

That's a fact.

I've read about of wiki leaks pages, so you are wrong there too.

I notice you and tang0 are wrong a lot.

I notice, you are wrong on everything, but you still continue to live in a small bubble while circlejerking in that echo chamber that you call a trump topic.

Raymond Lin · 22 Oct 2017 at 20:10

IronWarrior said:
I notice, you are wrong on everything, but you still continue to live in a small bubble while circlejerking in that echo chamber that you call a trump topic.

Touche.

tang0 · 22 Oct 2017 at 20:11

Oh really. I seem to remember you lot being so smug in the election thread how convinced you were Hillary was going to win, and believed all the skewed fake polls when it was me and a few others that were saying it was bs

Raymond Lin · 22 Oct 2017 at 20:12

tang0 said:
Oh really. I seem to remember you lot being so smug in the election thread how convinced you were Hillary was going to win, and believed all the skewed fake polls

And I had the integrity to admit defeat and have accepted the electron result but Trump hasn't let go and still on about electoral fraud with his committee.

Hypocrisy and ignorance right there.

Oh, what do you call 9 republican lead investigations?

tang0 · 22 Oct 2017 at 20:57

Senate Investigates Russia, Hillary Clinton, Obama, Uranium And Bribes — And It's About Time

http://www.investors.com/politics/e...-obama-uranium-and-bribes-and-its-about-time/

For the record, as has been extensively documented, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton seems to be the nexus of much of this Russian criminality — ironic, given her current "What Happened" book tour, and her ongoing complaints that the Russians sabotaged her campaign.

Does it seem strange that an American administration would OK the acquisition of 20% of America's uranium resources by a hostile nuclear power? How could that be?

It only makes sense if you understand what else was going on, namely Hillary Clinton's aggressive use of her State Department perch to raise money for the family "charity," the Clinton Foundation. That Clinton used her office to the foundation's advantage, there can be little doubt.

The Clinton Foundation took in some $145 million in contributions from Uranium One shareholders, much of it coming at about the time that deal won approval from CFIUS — the investment panel on which both Hillary Clinton and Attorney General Eric Holder conveniently sat. Is that a coincidence? Or that the Justice Department waited until 2014, the year after Hillary left office, to take any action in the Russian criminal matters? Or that details of the Uranium One deal didn't come out until 2015, the year Eric Holder left office? Was Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's "reset" with the Russian government in 2009 just part of a wider plan to enrich her own family foundation with Russian cash?

Then and only then will the American people discover the true dimensions of Russian meddling in the U.S. — and whether high officials in the Obama administration, in particular Hillary Clinton, committed crimes in office.

Raymond Lin · 22 Oct 2017 at 21:28

If 1 investigation is a witch hunt. What do you call 9 republican lead investigations?

(when you have answer that, then we will read your links)

Craterloads · 22 Oct 2017 at 21:57

The info is all out there but you demon worshippers refuse to go to the light to see for yourselves

Raymond Lin · 22 Oct 2017 at 22:05

Anyone who claims White house is run by space lizards has zero credibility, anyone who listens to him has no credibility either.

mmj_uk · 22 Oct 2017 at 22:24

tang0 said:
Senate Investigates Russia, Hillary Clinton, Obama, Uranium And Bribes — And It's About Time

http://www.investors.com/politics/e...-obama-uranium-and-bribes-and-its-about-time/

Add to all of that her use of a private email server rather than the secure government provided one and then accidently deleting 33,000 emails... it doesn't sound dodgy at all. They need to audit the Clinton Foundation she probably sold half the US's classified technology to the Chinese.

China proudly debuts its new stealth jet it built 'by hacking into US computers and stealing plans'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3893126/Chinese-J-20-stealth-jet-based-military-plans-stolen-hackers-makes-public-debut.html

"Hacked blueprints"? of course...