I like lord of the rings the main characters in that kill hundreds of orcs no one goes those films are rubbish because its unrealistic.
The knife was made from Valyrian steel not dragon glass.
Not sure if the NK was weak to dragon glass or not?
Forget about the night King now he's done we have a lot more juicy stuff to come The Hound vs the Mountain the Lannisters getting their arse kicked and Cersai getting her comeuppance.I'm hoping that whilst Bran was warging, he was going back in time / entering the NK's dreams, and that there's an entire "flashback" episode detailing that. It would flesh out what the NK wanted, what the heck Bran was up to, and possibly why there was such a long knowing look between the two of them.
Arya's not a Mary Sue - as you say, she's a trained assassin. But defeating the evil which has been building up for 8 series by legging it up to him and knifing him once is absurd, particularly given how many wounds all of the good characters have survived through. Yes, I appreciate that the NK is weak to dragonglass, but if that's all it was going to take why not just fly over him with a dragon and drop a massive dragonglass grenade on him ages ago?
Meh, OK - drop a bomb full of Valyrian daggers on him. You take my point. Building up 8 series to have him die of a wound which he could have received in multiple other ways, regardless of how rare the material which killed him was, is disappointing. She legged it up to him and stabbed him. Sure, the hand-changing thing was cool but not "world's greatest assassin" cool.
Forget about the night King now he's done we have a lot more juicy stuff to come The Hound vs the Mountain the Lannisters getting their arse kicked and Cersai getting her comeuppance.
Lol no - how about just don't compress it to within an inch of it's life and make it full of black artifacty squares
The knife was made from Valyrian steel not dragonglass.
Not sure if the NK was weak to dragonglass or not?
Building the NK up to be nothing more than a footnote just seems absurd. Why is he in the series at all? I would have been very happy if this was a whole series without him and purely about the squabble over the throne. By adding him and then removing him in such a disappointing way the creators have detracted massively from an otherwise excellent plot.
Sam also saw that blade in a book when he was researching.
Bran gave her that very blade.
There's a possibility the blade she used is significant.
I thought it was great myself, but she has long been my favourite character.
How is dealing with a load of mortal people who will be dead soon more juicy than dealing with the motives behind a great, previously immortal, evil? Even if Cersei wins she'll (a) be no worse than any other bad king/queen so why make a whole series about her, and (b) be dead in the next 50 years regardless.
Building the NK up to be nothing more than a footnote just seems absurd. Why is he in the series at all? I would have been very happy if this was a whole series without him and purely about the squabble over the throne. By adding him and then removing him in such a disappointing way the creators have detracted massively from an otherwise excellent plot.
I'm hoping that whilst Bran was warging, he was going back in time / entering the NK's dreams, and that there's an entire "flashback" episode detailing that. It would flesh out what the NK wanted, what the heck Bran was up to, and possibly why there was such a long knowing look between the two of them.
Arya's not a Mary Sue - as you say, she's a trained assassin. But defeating the evil which has been building up for 8 series by legging it up to him and knifing him once is absurd, particularly given how many wounds all of the good characters have survived through. Yes, I appreciate that the NK is weak to dragonglass, but if that's all it was going to take why not just fly over him with a dragon and drop a massive dragonglass grenade on him ages ago?
Meh, OK - drop a bomb full of Valyrian daggers on him. You take my point. Building up 8 series to have him die of a wound which he could have received in multiple other ways, regardless of how rare the material which killed him was, is disappointing. She legged it up to him and stabbed him. Sure, the hand-changing thing was cool but not "world's greatest assassin" cool.
Do you think that would be a suitable use of one of the three final episodes? A flash back to a character who has never uttered a word in the series.
Do I think that it would be worth finding out why the biggest evil man has faced and who has been built up for 8 series decided to rear his head at this time? What his motives are? Why he's so interested in killing the 3 Eyed Raven? Why he turned on the Children, his creators, in the first place (and indeed why they created him)?
But he's barely a character, just a figurehead. How much screen time has he personally had?
It was painfully obvious that the culmination to the series would be Cersei versus everyone else. Not sure how you've missed that... it would seem you've become fixated on the wrong things. Why would the writers spend valuable time focused on the Children (who've appeared in one or two scenes) rather than tier one characters??
Lol no - how about just don't compress it to within an inch of it's life and make it full of black artifacty squares