World first QD-OLED monitor from Dell and Samsung (34 inch Ultrawide 175hz)

Associate
Joined
30 Aug 2010
Posts
416
Nice! Looks a bit slimmer and more premium than the AW. Could live without the RGB but that's just a personal preference. Shame it can't be mounted and that seems like quite a limited number of connections, but the USB-C is nice. Not sure HDMI 2.1 and some speakers are enough of an improvement over the AW to really justify much of a price increase though.
Especially when most monitor speakers sound awful in my experience. Like even budget TV's or handheld devices had better speakers than them. Though maybe Samsung surprises.
 
Soldato
Joined
3 Aug 2010
Posts
3,081
LOL, turns off burn in protection mechanisms then leaves static images on screen with max brightness. No wonder there's burn in.
Hardly real world usage :cry:
It is alarming that it happened within 4 months though. Even with every mitigation in place burn in is inevitable given enough time just hope it doesn't happen after your warranty expires as the display becomes paperweight with zero resale value.

Too be honest I would never buy an OLED that has had years of usage even with no burn in.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
6 Oct 2004
Posts
18,506
Location
Birmingham
The sensible/cynical thing to do would be to deliberately cause burn-in after 2.5 years and get a warranty replacement at that point - and then either get hopefully another 2.5+ years of good use out of it, or sell as unused.
 
Last edited:

mrk

mrk

Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
101,317
Location
South Coast
I read that Jan 2023 is the release date - Who knows!


Can we take a moment to appreciate just how pure white the QD-OLED is though. I am reading documents and sites and just can't help but still marvel at how naturally pure the colour white is represented. It's like paper white in front of your eyeballs.

Other than the AR coating needing to be wiped every other day to remove specs that land on it from say an air freshener etc as a glossy front layer makes it more obvious than amatte one, my replacement has been nigh on perfect.
 
Last edited:
Permabanned
Joined
5 Oct 2022
Posts
127
Location
UK
Doesn’t the text look visibly low quality / slightly blurry if you’re used to 4K?

I haven’t seen this screen / resolution in person but I’m used to 4K (on my other computer 21.5” 2015 iMac 4K) I remember when I bought a good 1440P monitor last year and Windows and text instantly looked bad and I could never get used to it.
It was not an issue during gaming tho.

Wish there was a store we could demo this monitor..
 
Last edited:

mrk

mrk

Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
101,317
Location
South Coast
I don't use 4K monitors but text is fine generally. The pixel array renders text differently to normal RGB arrays but you can mitigate that by using Better Cleartext tool in Windows and setting it to RGB and a contrast of 2200. This is a one time only setting with the tool and you're done.
 
Associate
Joined
12 May 2020
Posts
21
What settings do you guys recommend for gaming on this monitor, had a quick look online and this old head of mine is spinning, not looking to pixel peep just want best basic performance/picture setting. simpler the better lol? Did I mention I'm old:cry:
 
Associate
Joined
19 Dec 2005
Posts
1,441
Look up vincents video/review, I think a lot of us are using the settings he recommended. (not at home so I can't write them out)
 

mrk

mrk

Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
101,317
Location
South Coast
What settings do you guys recommend for gaming on this monitor, had a quick look online and this old head of mine is spinning, not looking to pixel peep just want best basic performance/picture setting. simpler the better lol? Did I mention I'm old
:cry:

As a user of calibrated IPS panels forever, here's my personal preference for accurate colours and perfect balance of everything (to my eyes anyway).

Preset Mode: Creator with sRGB colour, 2.4 Gamma
Brightness: 53
Contrast: 66
HDR mode: Peak 1000

In Windows make sure that the display settings are suitably set and any Dell colour profiles are removed with colour preference set to "use my settings" as shown below. I prefer 10-bit colour and in srgb as I edit a lot and want maximum colour bandwidth - 10-bit means you are running at 144Hz instead of 175 (8-bit) so if that's not a problem, then stick to that otherwise you can use 8-bit and the GPU will dither effectively. I found personally that at 175Hz I could see some flickering in some games when certain dark grey tones were dominating the screen. At 144Hz this is completely gone. I read this is due to the use of the Gsync module as it's an old module now. There is no noticeable performance difference between 144Hz and 175Hz that I have found in desktop or gaming.

1:
d3X09CG.png

2:
4VDt5gw.png

3:
1j9VK4g.png


When using Windows have HDR mode turned off in Windows. OS level HDR in Windows is patchy, so only use HDR when gaming or watching a movie that is in HDR. Many games now auto trigger the SmartHDR function and will go back to normal mode when you exit the game. Likewise if you use MPC-BE with the MPC video renderer then that can be set to do the same thing when a HDR video is opened.
 
Last edited:
Associate
Joined
23 Feb 2009
Posts
1,036
As a user of calibrated IPS panels forever, here's my personal preference for accurate colours and perfect balance of everything (to my eyes anyway).

Preset Mode: Creator with sRGB colour, 2.4 Gamma
Brightness: 53
Contrast: 66
HDR mode: Peak 1000

In Windows make sure that the display settings are suitably set and any Dell colour profiles are removed with colour preference set to "use my settings" as shown below. I prefer 10-bit colour and in srgb as I edit a lot and want maximum colour bandwidth - 10-bit means you are running at 144Hz instead of 175 (8-bit) so if that's not a problem, then stick to that otherwise you can use 8-bit and the GPU will dither effectively. I found personally that at 175Hz I could see some flickering in some games when certain dark grey tones were dominating the screen. At 144Hz this is completely gone. I read this is due to the use of the Gsync module as it's an old module now. There is no noticeable performance difference between 144Hz and 175Hz that I have found in desktop or gaming.
The following from a gaming pov with vrr enabled. 175hz vs 144hz both have a very slight downside. 175 8bit has dithering, 144 10bit has a slight near black raise. I can personally detect the 144hz raise more than the dithering, so keep to 175hz.

For others reading, i stress that both downsides are so small that you would have to search for them. When it comes to VRR flicker, some may prefer to play at a lower set hz, because the drop in gamma won't be as jarring or noticeable (a game bumping from 175 to 130 will be more noticeable than 144 to 130 as the 144 is already at a slight raise and masks the flicker somewhat).
 
Last edited:

mrk

mrk

Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
101,317
Location
South Coast
Is that only in gaming though? At 144 10 bit I can assure that a 0,0,0 pure black image displaying full screen with no lights on is pure black and you cannot even tell where the screen is in front of you - Exactly as I would expect from any OLED.
 
Back
Top Bottom