http://www.realcourage.org/2009/07/uk-muslim-man-honor-attack/
Wheres her freedom to sleep with whoever she wants ?
That's nothing to do with Islam. Honour killings/attacks are mainly culture based.
http://www.realcourage.org/2009/07/uk-muslim-man-honor-attack/
Wheres her freedom to sleep with whoever she wants ?
Terrorism is terrorism, regardless of religion. My point was that all groups are capable of such acts. Banning the burkha is there for security due to the heightened 'threat' of Islamic terrorism.
Let's say, however extremely unlikely, that a nun commits a terrorist act. I know many can't see it happening but if it happened would legislation be passed to stop nuns wearing their robes?
Would you support it?
Somewhat curious to see who else voted No in the poll.
wow.
the amount of terrorism in the name of islam is so numerous it is not even worth my time listing, let's just say they covered all the continents copiously (except antartica)
when did a nun commit any terrorist act? not even going to answer your question since it's ridiculous, as are your arguments
And yet Christian extremists have bombed abortion clinics in the USA, killed doctors who perform abortion. That is done in the name of Christianity.
Assassination of George Tiller
Other cases:
September 30, 2000: A Catholic priest drove his car into the Northern Illinois Health Clinic after learning that the FDA had approved the drug RU-486. He pulled out an ax before being forced to the ground by the owner of the building who fired two warning shots from a shotgun.
Source
Army Of God
As I've said all sides, Chrisitian, Islam, Hinduism etc. have committed terrorist acts. Islam has become the bogeyman recently.
No one is talking about, for example, the Maoist attacks in India (Source) which are also terrorism. And these attacks are ongoing.
NY, Darfur, Israel, Bali, Spain, UK, India, France, Bosnia, Turkey, Nigeria, Niger, Ivory Coast, Uganda, Chechnya, Somalia, Yemen, Egypt, Jordan, Phillipines, and the list goes on. It's not a scapegoat as you put it, Islam has started these fires. frankly i find your comparison insulting.
NY, Darfur, Israel, Bali, Spain, UK, India, France, Bosnia, Turkey, Nigeria, Niger, Ivory Coast, Uganda, Chechnya, Somalia, Yemen, Egypt, Jordan, Phillipines, and the list goes on. It's not a scapegoat as you put it, Islam has started these fires. frankly i find your comparison insulting.
What an overly simplistic view you have on world affairs and history then.
Islam started all these fires did they?
![]()
i doubt that very muchall these were terrorist acts committed by radical islamists. this is fact. are you going to begin your apologetic arguments for islamist terrorism now??
all these were terrorist acts committed by radical islamists. this is fact
No, I'm going to scoff at your historical ignorance of why world affairs are as they are now.
You completely blame every terrorist problem in the world on islam, without taking consideration of the causes I suspect.
murderers and rapists have reasons too. it doen't excuse the behaviour - this doesnt change the facts that these were terrorist acts commited by fundamental islamists looking to gain control.
i am well travelled, speak several languages, have lived abroad in different countries for many years, attended some of the best universities so please refrain from scoffing at my historical ignorance.
Really?
Shame none of those fortunate circumstances afforded to you have not ingrained some historical understanding of the conflict between the West and Islam.
Instead, it is easier to say the fault lies with them because they are the ones currently recieving the most publicity for their actions?
What if we are state terrorists in their eyes?
For someone highly educated, you are thick as two short planks for drawing such obvious and ignorant conclusions of the world we live in.
lol are you the Imam at Finsbury mosque? you speak like a true apologist for terrorism
Apologist?
FYI a person who makes a defense in speech or writing of a belief, idea, etc.
secondly you are the one stating i am wrong, yet give no explanation. please enlighten us dumb masses with your superior knowlegde and insight professor.
Why don't you provide evidence for your own devoid conclusions first?