Just so we are clear, 47.5% to me means a minority
Only if the other 52.5% are of Middle Eastern descent, around 20% come from North Africa and South America, so those of Middle Eastern decent, such as those from Iran and other Middle Eastern countries represent another minority.
So the 47.5% represents a majority.
So, your statistic backs up my statement.
Therefore, as illustrated above, it doesn't.
Secondly, as pointed out above, if Jews were divested of their property and citizenship and that was the reason for leaving, I would not call it voluntary. Thirdly, I in the video posted at the top of this page (which I posted a couple of days ago on the other thread) you will note that through the work done by the Jews-Zionist or not-the land was vastly more productive which then allowed for an sizeable immigration of Arabs to come over to settle in the area and work the land as labourers.
Again, in Europe this was simply not the case, in some Arab nations this happened, but again the Arab immigrants represent a minority and places such as Algeria as mentioned, the minority is very small, around 3% including Tunisians.
When you have money and financial support it is easy to invest, develop and be more productive, it is not a reason or justification to divest a population of their land and citizenship or create a client ethnic group...wouldn't you agree?