Soldato
- Joined
- 20 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 12,059
- Location
- Derby
You can also get the evil within and wolfenstein for about £13 at the mo. Both well worth the cash and play through!
*** The Official Playstation 4 (PS4) Thread ***
- Thread starter Psycho Sonny
- Start date
You can also get the evil within and wolfenstein for about £13 at the mo. Both well worth the cash and play through!
What did it download? Three versions of DLC 3?
Soldato
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2012
- Posts
- 12,438
- Location
- UK.
Yeah it's done with every COD DLC pack so far. Always downloads 3 versions with very similar file sizes, but only installs 1 of them. Then you have to delete the other 2. Just wondering does anybody know why this is? If it's regional surely the PS4 has set region so should know it's English language etc. Would save time bandwidth if you could just select the right one to download rather than having to get all 3..
Yeah cos one thing the ps4 needs is more remastered old games
I never played them before, and no-one is forcing anyone to buy them, so please give me one logical explanation why it's a bad thing, especially when the price falls dramatically within a few weeks after release?
I didn't realise Journey was cross buy, awesome
Have I missed something? Has it released on the PS4 now?
Wasting time when they could be creating something new perhaps?
I view it as them just trying to make quick money.
This is how I've always felt. With the amount of time they take to make these re-mastered games, that time could be better spent on something new. So instead of a games company spending 5 months on re-mastered game and then building a new game in 16 months after that. They could just build a new game and have it delivered 5 months early.
I think the issue is people are running out of ideas though.
Or maybe they are using basic business sense and realise there is still a huge demand for the titles on the new formats from people who never bought a PS3 or below and really want to play some of the legendary games?
it's rarely huge demand and it's just lazy
In your possibly uninformed opinion, considering how much they clearly HAVE sold.
To say there is no demand is just...well... you know.
Did I say no demand? No i said I didn't believe there was a huge demand, some people are just......
Whatever your opinion there is no denying that quality remasters do sell and they do so in large numbers.
It's probably shortsighted to suggest that remasters are denying us new games as often they are either made as side projects while the main team are working on new titles, or they are made by smaller teams who specialize in remastering games. I can't think of any examples of quality developers being forced to put out remasters in place of new games.
It's probably shortsighted to suggest that remasters are denying us new games as often they are either made as side projects while the main team are working on new titles, or they are made by smaller teams who specialize in remastering games. I can't think of any examples of quality developers being forced to put out remasters in place of new games.
How do you know they are working on other games also? Nothing to say they are forced to push out re-mastered games, it's more of a choice they make imo. It's easy, quick and still a money maker over creating a new game.
Theres a thread for this - I suggest you guys use that.
Ultimately not every person in a developer works 100% on a single game until its released. Once their job is done its on to the the next project. When it comes to remasters do you guys really think the people that are directly involved in coming up with a new concept of a game are actually engaged?
Do you think Neil Druckmann was involved day to day with the TLOU remaster or more likely dealing with the Uncharted 4 script/direction?
Most of these objections just come over as uninformed - I dont disagree a lot of remasters are cash grabs but to infer they lead to a reduction of new games seems to be a point made on shaky ground. Theres far more relevant factors involved causing that (for example publishers not interested in risky IP ventures and more interested in safer sequels)
ps3ud0
Ultimately not every person in a developer works 100% on a single game until its released. Once their job is done its on to the the next project. When it comes to remasters do you guys really think the people that are directly involved in coming up with a new concept of a game are actually engaged?
Do you think Neil Druckmann was involved day to day with the TLOU remaster or more likely dealing with the Uncharted 4 script/direction?
Most of these objections just come over as uninformed - I dont disagree a lot of remasters are cash grabs but to infer they lead to a reduction of new games seems to be a point made on shaky ground. Theres far more relevant factors involved causing that (for example publishers not interested in risky IP ventures and more interested in safer sequels)
ps3ud0