Tower block fire - london

I still cant believe how many people are jealous/crying about easyrider's qualification. :D

He has a qualification and he's proud of it. I mean is it really worth whining over? Some people seem to be phobic to anyone and anything academic.
 
I've discussed a number of topics here, when it appears that what I've asked/suggested can't be reasonably answered or countered a succession of personal attacks have occurred, including all sorts of mumbo jumbo/pseudo psychology and rude names.

no, yesterday you decided not to engage in discussion and simply became a bit of a time waster with your sealioning antics... for some reason you decided that this approach somehow made you like Jeremy Paxman

http://simplikation.com/why-sealioning-is-bad/
 
I still cant believe how many people are jealous/crying about easyrider's qualification. :D

He has a qualification and he's proud of it. I mean is it really worth whining over? Some people seem to be phobic to anyone and anything academic.

Well in terms of qualification my Rimmer style BSc trumps all (Bronze Swimming Certificate) :)

no, yesterday you decided not to engage in discussion and simply became a bit of a time waster with your seasoning antics... for some reason you decided that this approach somehow made you like Jeremy Paxman

http://simplikation.com/why-sealioning-is-bad/

No, despite proposing new regulation to a problem you accepted exists, you refused to say that the current regulation was inadequate, one hundred times.
Then you and a couple of "buddies" set about internet diagnosis, which included suggesting a diagnosis of self aggrandising, oh the irony of the internet Dr's :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
confirming what exactly? You told another poster to 'educate' himself then mentioned Trump I 'm too really sure what your point was but I thought it might be worth pointing out that targeting people on social media isn't exactly confined to Trump's campaign and is pretty well know

To some it is well known. To others not.

Welcome to the social media generation of politics.

It's no longer about actually doing anything but having the correct time line photo update

This post highlights just how very little Tefal knows about how the media works.

He's knocking the social media generation of politics....But this is no different to print based media of years before...

The technology has changed...But the Political manipulation of the masses has not.

See this post

Well I suppose at least Trump (and/or his people) were smart enough to know how easy it is to buy the votes of the gullible who cant actually deal with the issues at hand and take their guidance of a social media time line.........

Not a stunning endorsement is it?

This post reeks of naivety. Its the same model as Newspapers ongoing and years before but digital and yet he's using the "Platform of social media to vilify the gullible"

The elite few own the UK media and the worlds media...They broadcast political agenda.

Zuckerberg and anyone else will always be able to be bought. If this wasn't the case then Fake news would not exist on FB.
 
Last edited:
yes, Your point?

I was just confirming it.



Regardless of party or politcal agenda.

There are 75 million Fake accounts on FB currently

There are millions of Twitter Bots on Twitter....Engineered by software companies to Target voters.


And yet you've bought in to it wholly.


You don't care about action, regulation change or any real consequence you cared about who got the best picture with a sobbing resident
 
This post reeks of naivety. Its the same model as Newspapers ongoing and years before but digital and yet he's using the "Platform of social media to vilify the gullible"

Digital and Paper are very different though. Digital you can literally track everything about the person and deliver targeted content. So if a person has visited a page about certain political concerns, fb/twitter/etc can track that you've visited such pages using tracking cookies, embedded social media buttons, etc.

Then they can show you bespoke content which will prey on your concerns/whatever. There's ALWAYS data being collected. Even the position where you stop scrolling is logged, including how long you stop there, where you hover the mouse is logged, etc.etc.etc.

When reading a newspaper everyone reads the same thing.
 
And yet you've bought in to it wholly.


You don't care about action, regulation change or any real consequence you cared about who got the best picture with a sobbing resident

Frankly that you describe a genuine human exchange like that, at this time, is a little sick!
 
And yet you've bought in to it wholly.


You don't care about action, regulation change or any real consequence you cared about who got the best picture with a sobbing resident

No

May not going is nothing to do with anything but being Human.

its that simple.
 
To some it is well known. To others not.



This post highlights just how very little Tefal knows about how the media works.

He's knocking the social media generation of politics....But this is no different to print based media of years before...

The technology has changed...But the Political manipulation of the masses has not.

See this post



This post reeks of naivety. Its the same model as Newspapers ongoing and years before but digital and yet he's using the "Platform of social media to vilify the gullible"

The elite few own the UK media and the worlds media...They broadcast political agenda.

Zuckerberg and anyone else will always be able to be bought. If this wasn't the case then Fake news would not exist on FB.


You are correct I do not have a media studies degree/insider knowledge of the media

I do not need that though to point out that we have several pages of people arguing all over the fact that you think may is awful for not getting there for the photo op sooner.

Where in any of this stupidity has anything been said about what matters?

What is may or corbyn doing?

Great they've hugged shaken hands had thier pictures, the utterly worthless crap is done and delta with.

The real work now, what's going to change?
 
Digital and Paper are very different though. Digital you can literally track everything about the person and deliver targeted content. So if a person has visited a page with specific concerns, fb/twitter/etc can track that you've visited such pages using tracking cookies, embedded social media buttons, etc.

Then they can show you bespoke content which will prey on your concerns/whatever.

Yes , exactly my point.

Newspapers ( before the internet) did exactly the same thing.

They still do to an extent but print based Newspapers are dying. And moving to an online model.

The Agenda still stays the same regardless of platform though.
 
Frankly that you describe a genuine human exchange like that, at this time, is a little sick!
Huh? But that's exactly what it is.

Political point scoring, nothing of value was achieved by anyone on either side.

It's not a genuine human exchange at all its a stage managed publicity event designed to increase support for a party/person.
 
No, despite proposing new regulation to a problem you accepted exists, you refused to say that the current regulation was inadequate, one hundred times.
Then you and a couple of "buddies" set about internet diagnosis, which included suggesting a diagnosis of self aggrandising, oh the irony of the internet Dr's :)

no you just asked repeated pointless questions instead of engaging in discussion and ironically avoided answering when asked to clarify, it was hardly just me that noticed it

especially un-constructive when the original post was pretty straightforward for you to understand - I proposed increasing council tax on vacant properties I didn't propose any additional regulations, you then kept banging on about regulations... it was utterly pointless
 
You are correct I do not have a media studies degree/insider knowledge of the media

I do not need that though to point out that we have several pages of people arguing all over the fact that you think may is awful for not getting there for the photo op sooner.

Where in any of this stupidity has anything been said about what matters?

What is may or corbyn doing?

Great they've hugged shaken hands had thier pictures, the utterly worthless crap is done and delta with.

The real work now, what's going to change?

Its not about that.

You need a paradigm shift, You need to put yourself in the position of the people in London.
 
I still cant believe how many people are jealous/crying about easyrider's qualification. :D

He has a qualification and he's proud of it. I mean is it really worth whining over? Some people seem to be phobic to anyone and anything academic.

Actually I think we are all mocking him because lets face it a BA these days is about as impressive as cycling proficiency badge...

...and yes I do have a degree but no I would never 'brag' about it on the internet lol.
 
Huh? But that's exactly what it is.

Political point scoring, nothing of value was achieved by anyone on either side.

It's not a genuine human exchange at all its a stage managed publicity event designed to increase support for a party/person.

Not from the POV of a member of the community....

Their POV is nothing at all to do with anything you state in this post.

They didn't even Vote her in, and yet they still wanted to be seen to be supported by the leader of this country.
 
Actually I think we are all mocking him because lets face it a BA these days is about as impressive as cycling proficiency badge...


I gained my degree years and years ago. Plus Mock all you like , doesn't bother me....All it does is highlight inadequacies in your response.

Again you have devalued academia today....

Based on what exactly?

By bet is you got a Desmond?

...and yes I do have a degree but no I would never 'brag' about it on the internet lol.

You just did

:D
 
Last edited:
Frankly that you describe a genuine human exchange like that, at this time, is a little sick!

I dont think it was a genuine human exchange i think corbyn was there for a photo opportunity. a carefully stage managed photo with the grieving families.

He could have organised a meeting with them in private away from the media. expressed his concerns to them told them what he would try to do to help. how he would push the goverment for answers etc. but that wouldnt have got his face on the news.

The guy is still fighting the election. or the next one that he hopes will come by very soon,

And soon after he leaves the place is flooded with corbyn supporters and the socialist worker turns up. next thing you know the councill office doors are getting kicked in and there is a march through london.

All carefully stage managed to get massive media exposure. to show how nasty the tories are but what a jolly nice chap that corbyn guy is did you see him on the news hugging that poor women what a nice guy job done seed planted,
 
I dont think it was a genuine human exchange i think corbyn was there for a photo opportunity. a carefully stage managed photo with the grieving families.

He could have organised a meeting with them in private away from the media. expressed his concerns to them told them what he would try to do to help. how he would push the goverment for answers etc. but that wouldnt have got his face on the news.

The guy is still fighting the election. or the next one that he hopes will come by very soon,

And soon after he leaves the place is flooded with corbyn supporters and the socialist worker turns up. next thing you know the councill office doors are getting kicked in and there is a march through london.

All carefully stage managed to get massive media exposure. to show how nasty the tories are but what a jolly nice chap that corbyn guy is did you see him on the news hugging that poor women what a nice guy job done seed planted,

BS Post

Kensington Voted Labour in.

Why wouldn't the leader go and meet the people who voted him into that constituency

Next
 
And yet you've bought in to it wholly.


You don't care about action, regulation change or any real consequence you cared about who got the best picture with a sobbing resident

She is our leader and any leader should care some bit about the group. I believe she does and went there out of genuine concern but did the wrong thing.

A ten minute chat with a few chosen residents would have made them and her feel better for a short while.

Doesn't matter that she can't solve there problems instantly, she could have heard there genuine concerns and have a bit of humanity for them.

It's a bit more then a photo op.
 
Back
Top Bottom