So, how is it they can afford to eat 4k+ calories a day consistently if they are so poor and deprived?
Those £2 chicken and chip shops. That's how.
So, how is it they can afford to eat 4k+ calories a day consistently if they are so poor and deprived?
"cheaper" food is mainly carbohydrate based - starchy fillers, bread, potatoes etc.Those £2 chicken and chip shops. That's how.
We all are but not by choiceWould it make a difference to this conversation if I pointed out that I was a tax payer?![]()
Indeed. So not sure why there's this echo of "but the taxpayer must foot the bill"We all are but not by choice![]()
No, the tax payer foots the bill. Which has an knock on effect to everyone else.
Would it make a difference to this conversation if I pointed out that I was a tax payer?![]()
So have I been dirt poor being homeless when I was a kid. Food has changed dramatically since I was a kid though which is why the obesity epidemic has been steadily increasing over the years, because the advent of energy dense ultra processed food at very cheap prices didn't exist when I was a kid.
Also not every poor person is going to be obese, just a larger proportion of them compared to better off groups of people. Some poor families eat poorly because no one knows how to cook properly from scratch, some eat like that solely for convenience and price etc
Hey who told you my name?!This is unfortunately the justification a lot of people like to use for abusing things like the NHS. "I paid taxes all my life". Yes you did Steve and by the age of 45 every single penny of your entire working life worth of taxes was spent on your constant use of the NHS for the plethora of easily preventable health issues you have.
Steve Sinbad... Like Steven Segal but cooler id say..![]()
Knocking up a decent meal from scratch is just that, quick and easy, and if you can't rustle up a healthy alternative to a crappy processed ready meal in 20-30mins then you should probably get your carer(s) to help.You can make your own meals most likely cheaper but this is not "quick" and "easy"
Which is essentially the same thingI pay for Rybelsus. Works/ed for me, still got 10-15lbs to lose before i get to my ideal weight.
Exercise has little impact on a poor diet.
Generally if you can't control your diet to something vaguely sensible you're not going to be banging out 1k cals cardio sessions either.Thats not true. You won't have a six pack and you won't be super healthy but burning 1000 calories on a bike ride will 100% have an impact on your weight over time. The issue is when people do 20 minutes of exercise and then eat an extra 500 calories after burning 200.
Why is it always pies though, how come fatties never get addicted to fruit and salads?Food can be an addiction,
I'm considerably fatter than I should be. When I do find the willpower to lose weight, I can lose weight.People are so harsh. I lost a lot of weight and got fitter after a good chunk of time half heartedly trying to fix things. The standard fad diets, half arsed exercise etc etc. But I didn't see it as that way at all, at the time my mental state and lack of fitness meant I viewed every slight mistake as total failure, every bit of effort required felt insurmountable.
It took afew moments of realisation, and a real attitude change for me to make the adjustments needed, and I still don't really understand why on that one specific night, lying in bed, I just decided I had to do something about it. I absolutely needed those moments to start kicking my head into a different gear though. Things like visiting friends I hadn't seen for awhile and being so unfit that to walk around a city I borrowed a bike. And I was still exhausted. Getting to the point I was almost starting to waddle like a penguin was another one.
Once you start and do manage to stick to things, it gets a lot easier very quickly. Once you realise eating a bit much on one day won't derail your entire attempt, it gets a lot easier. But getting to that mindset can be incredibly difficult, and if some people need a crutch to get going and even continue, then what's the problem? They'll hopefully end up healthier and happier in the end, and that's what matters.
Food can be an addiction, it's not as simple as just willpower for some. I consider myself fortunate that I wasn't addicted, I was just miserable, which made me lazy, which made me more miserable, so why bother trying?
Though I do think doing it without having to take a drug is going to be better, if someone can't manage that then go for it.
I have much more of an issue with parents forcing their lifestyles diets on their kids though. Not even forcing really, just not doing things properly for them.
Why is it always pies though, how come fatties never get addicted to fruit and salads?
I have no doubt that many people need support to lose weight. Just drugs might not be the best support.No idea, more satisfying, highly processed, gets the endorphins going in the brain? Laziness (as I with myself) and wanting something hot that is prepared. A lot of it probably has to do with the salt. And what is it they put in pringles to make them more addictive? I know I prefered something savoury over a bit of salad when I used to comfort eat.
A lot of my problem wasn't the type of food I was eating though, it was quantity. I'd eat too much, fell bad about it then ultimately end up eating more. Vicious circles yadda yadda. None of this is me making excuses, it's just how it is. A bit of empathy, or a realisation of a lack of perspective can go a long way but expecting that seems almost naive sometimes. That isn't aimed at you specifically!
I'm considerably fatter than I should be. When I do find the willpower to lose weight, I can lose weight.
It hasn't stayed off because I tend to go back to eating too much.
That doesn't mean it's more than a function of my willpower, tho. The fact that I can lose weight when I choose to suggests it's entirely a function of my willpower. The weight comes back because I go back to making bad choices.
I also very much won't take drugs when I don't have to. Although I have no medical training, and I respect doctors for their expertise, you don't have to look hard to see the true face of the drugs industry. The fact that drugs designed for one purpose are discovered to "accidentally" work for other things. Drugs are not scalpel, carefully and precisely targetting the problem and only the problem. Drugs are more like a sledgehammer, and their effects not entirely predictable or understood. Why else would a drug designed for A end up being used for B, after clinical trials discovered this alternate use?
Until we know the precise reasons why every drug does what it does, my common sense (such as it is) tells me to stay the hell away from all but the most essential medications. We mess around with the functioning of our bodies without a complete understanding of how they work, necessarily. And that scares me enough not to do it.