Don’t be silly, you need 24GB, otherwise the games won’t be playable I hear?
vram is a scam just like ram, PCs don't need memory it's just to stop us from downloading more ram
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Don’t be silly, you need 24GB, otherwise the games won’t be playable I hear?
Except i don't remember anyone saying that 10GB would be an issue in one years time.+1
A year on we have yet to see 10GB not being enough in something worth playing, yet the thread is still alive
You are right, most were saying it was an issue from the get goExcept i don't remember anyone saying that 10GB would be an issue in one years time.
Yep, that is what I do. I have 8GB on my card, when I decide to run games like Half Life 2 I am forced to download 16GB more VRAM to make sure it runs smoothlyvram is a scam just like ram, PCs don't need memory it's just to stop us from downloading more ram
When Far Cry 6 comes out some review site should do a texture analysis, compare visual quality versus VRAM usage and what offers the best balance. I think a lot of the time ultra and extreme settings offer very little in terms of visual improvement but gobble up resources terribly, they're basically there to justify high end graphics cards.
It's there because pc gamers want it to be there, it's PCvgamers who want to try and justify their $5k gaming rig
So according to Ubisoft 10gb vram is indeed not enough, is this the point where all the 3080 users complain on how bad the game visually looks like without the game or the HD texture pack being released yet?
*sits back and grabs popcorn*
You talking about gfx or the game itself? Div 1 looked good when it came out, the game itself with just one area after another, of opponents that took 300 more bullets to kill than the last area.
.
The kicker is that even if, and its a big if, the game somehow tanked framerate if you dont have 16gb vram when using the HD texture options - chances are the HD texture option makes an extremely small differences to the image quality.
Its like the difference between a .jpeg image and a .raw image - the pros will tell you they can see a difference, the average person can't see it. Same goes for HD texture packs in games
So according to Ubisoft 10gb vram is indeed not enough, is this the point where all the 3080 users complain on how bad the game visually looks like without the game or the HD texture pack being released yet?
*sits back and grabs popcorn*
As 99% of PC gamers will have a card that has 8GB or less on it then they wont sell many copies if they programmed the game like that. That said, 99% of gamers are still on 1080p resolution too so higher textures pack wont make a sausage of difference to most. HD = 1080p
That's the one!Godfall
Don't worry @TNA at least you have the right CPU to run the game at 30 fps...