Woodsta for once in your life, please stop talking complete nonsense. I understand this might be difficult for you since it is your forte. Look, everyone knows you'd had a few drinks the other night when you misunderstood Tommys post and went on a long drunken rant (we all had a good laugh about that btw ) but you are just being daft now. Put the drink down and get some perspective. You might be retired, but you are definitely not out of the rat race. You are right in the thick of it, acting the big man when in reality you are just a sad old and clearly forgetful, man.There 'tis ^^^^^ Turkeys clapping for xmas - like it's a good thing.
The thinking and logic seems to be that it's best to spend many £100's of £'s extra on hardware, over the programming of a £40-£50 game on release.
It's never the game though - always the hardware you need to change - don't wait for those things that have been added to games forever - called patches/updates etc. Nope - rush out and get a better card.
Whole thing was brought about and driven by the divisive AMD online customer services operative. That is all we need to know.
If we look back at the original 10GB thread, it was started by someone else. Nothing to do with me at all so again, stop talking nonsense. At various points throughout the 10GB thread, people asked for an example of where 10GB was not enough. That was provided (shock horror!). It's not our fault you can't accept that, choose to ignore that, and choose to insult me and anyone else that says otherwise. Those results I posted from PcGamesHardware and later Computerbase (which you claimed were false and threw a load of your usual insults at the time par for the course) have now been backed up by multiple 3080 owners, Tommy, Stooeh, Gerard, etc.
Regarding turning settings down, lets clear up something else. If you don't run maximum settings, this is less of an issue. If you don't install the optional texture pack, its not an issue at all. For some reason this was very difficult for people (yourself included) to grasp when the game came out when you were disputing the (biased - your words) tech press results. However if you want to see an issue, you copy the settings used by said tech press which means you run at maximum settings. No one ever said you cant turn settings down, but if you want to test if 10GB (or 12GB) is enough and you want to validate the tech results, you use max settings. This is just basic common sense, hopefully now its been explained to you it will sink in, although given your age I suspect it will all be forgotten when your next drunken rant commences.
Well summarised Tommy.Tf it wasn't FC6, but your brave.
The rest of us probably couldn't be arsed by this point discussing other titles struggling on 10Gb.
Whenever 3080 users pointed out 10Gb being poor-it was walls of nonsense full of negativity aimed their way with the 90 and AMD used as some form of justification.
Some still maintain in total ignorance its just FC6-the one title.
All because they believed the one person@ocuk told the forum they can run FC6 max everything on 10gb because they showed it running ok for wee bursts of gameplay footage.
Not surprised their FC6 worked ok over a short space of time, staying in the one map point, making sure not to trigger map streaming, and they didn't record ANY active raytracing, I could re create those vids on an 8Gb 3070@4K FFS.
Despite plenty saying in FC6 threads in here it was ok/they enjoyed it/didn't enjoy it but the default excuse is 'but the games *****'.
Last edited: