• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

14th Gen "Raptor Lake Refresh"

I'd suggest starting a new thread and posting a diagram of what you've got connected where, as I'm not sure why you'd need to use a PCI-E power plug for your motherboard when the HX1000 has 2x EPS 8 pin plugs, and 8x PCI-E plugs?


If you must use adapters, then 2xmolex to 6 pin are the better option as they're normally better constructed and the connectors can cope with more load.
Okay will do. sorry yeah the 2 eps plugs share the same slots on the back of the PSU as the PCI-E its just on the device end they are different, the issue is there are 6 of those but I need a 7th basically for the Icue link hub.

I did also consider molex as max output is higher but seen some people say stay well away from them for fire risk.
 
Last edited:
I did also consider molex as max output is higher but seen some people say stay well away from them for fire risk.

AFAIK the only specific fire risk is some Molex to SATA adapters, unless something I'm not aware of. As long as the Molex to PCI-e adapter is of good quality and fitted securely there is no fire risk - but loose connections and/or poor quality connectors can produce one due to the currents involved.

EDIT: Though the cabling on a lot of generic Molex adapters can't handle more than ~120 watt or so within its spec range.
 
Last edited:
EDIT: Though the cabling on a lot of generic Molex adapters can't handle more than ~120 watt or so within its spec range.
Much better than the 54w sata is rated for (and sata cables were often moulded rather than crimped and caught fire when used at the limit)
 
Okay will do. sorry yeah the 2 eps plugs share the same slots on the back of the PSU as the PCI-E its just on the device end they are different, the issue is there are 6 of those but I need a 7th basically for the Icue link hub.
Can you not get a 2xtype 4 to 12v hpwr GPU cable instead of presumably using 4x pci-e cables for the GPU?

 
Last edited:
Can you not get a 2xtype 4 to 12v hpwr GPU cable instead of presumably using 4x pci-e cables for the GPU?

Didn't even know my PSU was compatible with those. Although I have a cablemod kit for it so wouldn't want to lose the colour. although if they do a white one that could work yeah
 
Installed new cable, able to plug second EPS in again for CPU, Still says power throttling in XTU but much less often/severely. I tried cinebench 2024 and got a score of 1920 which seems a bit low for a 14900k no? XTU was showing CPU utilisation of between 94 and 97% Tried R23 and score was 34315 with utilisation in XTU at 100% most of the time but almost always power throttling, briefly thermal throttles for a second at the start of each render pass
 
Last edited:
14900KS leaked :eek:


If true, impressive binning from Intel. I really doubted we'd see such a CPU. These will have to be god tier bins to achieve 6.2Ghz long enough for benchmarks to pass/reviewers to reflect performance gains.

I'll get one, as will be a decent bump from my just above average clocking 13900K. Will still keep my 7950X3D in my gaming rig though most likely, depends how cold it gets this Winter :cry:
 
Last edited:
14900KS leaked :eek:


If true, impressive binning from Intel. I really doubted we'd see such a CPU. These will have to be god tier bins to achieve 6.2Ghz long enough for benchmarks to pass/reviewers to reflect performance gains.

I'll get one, as will be a decent bump from my just above average clocking 13900K. Will still keep my 7950X3D in my gaming rig though most likely, depends how cold it gets this Winter :cry:
same CPU as the 13900K mate :p

Joking aside i will be grabbing one as well and looking to direct die cool it same as my 13900k , looking forward to having a play so fingers crossed it gets released :D
 
same CPU as the 13900K mate :p

Joking aside i will be grabbing one as well and looking to direct die cool it same as my 13900k , looking forward to having a play so fingers crossed it gets released :D

Yeah it's still the worst new generation Intel ever released (excluding the i7), as identical in architecture and no IPC increase. Frequency boost from my 13900K will be noticeable though, plus fun to play with new toys :D
 
6.2GHz isn't really much of a performance boost over stock :s and from what I've seen so far if your cooling is sufficient 6.2GHz boost should be possible on a lot of the non KS chips.
 
Yeah it's still the worst new generation Intel ever released (excluding the i7), as identical in architecture and no IPC increase. Frequency boost from my 13900K will be noticeable though, plus fun to play with new toys :D
No, the 11th Gen was objectively their worst release as that was actually a new generation but yet in many cases SLOWER than 10th Gen. The same can never be said of this 14th "Gen" compared to 13th.

6.2GHz isn't really much of a performance boost over stock :s and from what I've seen so far if your cooling is sufficient 6.2GHz boost should be possible on a lot of the non KS chips.
True. If it's 6.2Ghz boost then that's not something to write home about as I am doing that currently with my 13700K.
Now, if it could do 6.2Ghz all core then that would be an improvement.
 
Last edited:
6.2 all core for gaming loads should be possible considering if you have a good 13900k it can run at 6ghz all core for gaming loads if your cooling setup is sufficient you you utilise TVB properly which is exactly what Bang4buck does with his so no reason why the 14900KS couldn't do 6.2 under gaming loads if cooling is sufficient and its some sort of god tier bin which they should be... Heavy work loads like Cinebench not a chance imo
 
6.2GHz isn't really much of a performance boost over stock :s and from what I've seen so far if your cooling is sufficient 6.2GHz boost should be possible on a lot of the non KS chips.

By the same logic, 6.4Ghz would probably also be doable on the higher binned KS parts, if cooling if sufficient.
 
Yeah it's still the worst new generation Intel ever released (excluding the i7), as identical in architecture and no IPC increase. Frequency boost from my 13900K will be noticeable though, plus fun to play with new toys :D


Ah no, the worst generation is the 11th gen, which we warned you about but you bought anyway; worst because its performance was lower than 10th gen. It's one thing to have the same performance, it's a whole other to go backwards like 11th gen did






But the 11th gen Core i Series was not the first generation to go backwards. It happened in early 2000s with the Intel Pentium 4. The first Pentium 4's that released were slower than the top Pentium 3 models

 
Last edited:
6.2 all core for gaming loads should be possible considering if you have a good 13900k it can run at 6ghz all core for gaming loads if your cooling setup is sufficient you you utilise TVB properly which is exactly what Bang4buck does with his so no reason why the 14900KS couldn't do 6.2 under gaming loads if cooling is sufficient and its some sort of god tier bin which they should be... Heavy work loads like Cinebench not a chance imo

Imagine the power draw with 6.2Ghz all core :cry:
 
Back
Top Bottom