2022 mini-budget discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wow, you're really stacking up the question ain't you, first you don't answer who you'd assign blame too for someone not being in full time employment and now you've added who you think is responsible for the economy.

FYI underemployment, people who want to work more than 16 hours but can't because it's unavailable, is currently 6.7% so your why don't they just work more is utter rubbish.

There are over a million job vacancies in the UK, 6.7% under employment seems like a fairly low figure, what would you expect that to be, 2%?
 
At least Govey is in the corner of the working man (he's had his period on the bench now)

shaden, but ... did they not allow cameras in to all the truss conference speeches ? guru murphy was describing the truss audience as 2/3 full with partial applause, people remaining in their seats.
 
At least Govey is in the corner of the working man (he's had his period on the bench now)

shaden, but ... did they not allow cameras in to all the truss conference speeches ? guru murphy was describing the truss audience as 2/3 full with partial applause, people remaining in their seats.
Quite a few MP's have declined to attend apparently.
 
This whole discussion is just one endless deflection from the unpleasant righties and their failing ideology. Standard.

I see we're back to the right versus left again. It never changes. Were you right with your voting through your entire life were you? Are you such a saint? Labour wasn't exactly a hillside of marigolds and daffodils from 2001 - 2010. As well as the delayed catchup of their policies coming through the system.
 
I see we're back to the right versus left again. It never changes. Were you right with your voting through your entire life were you? Are you such a saint? Labour wasn't exactly a hillside of marigolds and daffodils from 2001 - 2010. As well as the delayed catchup of their policies coming through the system.
I have no illusions that a Labour government would right all the disasters of the last 12 years (14 by the time the Cons are out) but at this point I would take Lord Buckethead over Truss.
 
The only corner he's in is what he perceives might be the most useful for him to be in.
in the land of the Truss, the one eyed Gove is king.
(Govey is a term they they use satirically in a lot of R4 shows, not sure how he is represented in spitting image if that is still running)
 
Can someone explain JRM's man maths because I'm not quite getting it:

Rees-Mogg says top rate income tax cut 'could raise extra revenue'​

Business Secretary Jacob Rees-Mogg said he would not be surprised if the cut to the top rate of income tax would raise extra revenue.
He told a fringe event at the Tory party conference: "Cutting the tax rate from 50p to 45p didn't actually cost the taxpayer anything at all, it saw income come in.
"So let's be careful about these forecasts. They are not holy writ, they are guesses at what may happen and it wouldn't surprise me in the least that 40p raises more money for HMRC than 45p does."
 
To be honest... If there was a vote tomorrow and this mess today still exists or has become really dire by 2024, I don't see where I could put my vote. None of them are delivering. None of them are even capable.
How exactly are parties other than the Tories meant to ”deliver” other than by forcing a majority government into repeated u-turns as Labour has done?
 
Can someone explain JRM's man maths because I'm not quite getting it:

Rees-Mogg says top rate income tax cut 'could raise extra revenue'​

Business Secretary Jacob Rees-Mogg said he would not be surprised if the cut to the top rate of income tax would raise extra revenue.
He told a fringe event at the Tory party conference: "Cutting the tax rate from 50p to 45p didn't actually cost the taxpayer anything at all, it saw income come in.
"So let's be careful about these forecasts. They are not holy writ, they are guesses at what may happen and it wouldn't surprise me in the least that 40p raises more money for HMRC than 45p does."

Laffer curve.

 
Last edited:
"Cutting the tax rate from 50p to 45p didn't actually cost the taxpayer anything at all, it saw income come in
This was a sleight of hand. The reduction in top rate was announced in advance (as is usual), so high earners deferred income to the next tax year: hence lower tax take at the higher rate when comparing year on year

We'll see the same effect this time, and the Tories will use the same trick to make their claims.
 
I see we're back to the right versus left again. It never changes. Were you right with your voting through your entire life were you? Are you such a saint? Labour wasn't exactly a hillside of marigolds and daffodils from 2001 - 2010. As well as the delayed catchup of their policies coming through the system.

Was better, fact. Tories have failed, people need to stop deflecting and move onto something better.
 
So we build a society where 20% of jobs are insufficiently remunerated to support living costs, and blame the people working those jobs for being suckers for doing them?
Don't forget whilst expecting them to boost the population so that we can stop immigration.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom