Well not fully true i went over all reviews and not all 8700k can hit 5ghz even at 1.4 vcore.
But agree with rest. People have to remember that Warranty is on OCUK pocket NOT INTELS!# if one of tjose delided cpus die ocuk is covering ots full cost. Not that they would die bit yhey can stock cpu can just die.
As i see it ocuk could do it this way.
Just delid 50 pounds.
Delid with warranty 100 pounds.
And as it is binned delid 150 pounds.
Bit then again i bet we would see posts from stupid people like.
I got scamed by ocuk my delided 8700k can do only 4.8x6 i bet they sent me one rejected from binning QQ.
And as I and 8 Pack mentioned not all 8700ks can do 5ghz on qll cores stable.
Didn't 8Pack or Gibbo say that they only had 1 fail to hit 5.0Ghz after delidding? So out of 30, it's pretty much a cert that you will get 5.0.
You're viewing it from ocuks perspective. I couldn't care less as I look at it from a consumer/customer perspective. I'd be interested to see the uptake on none binned delid only where you're paying less for what is virtually guaranteed 4.8+ anyway. Noise and temps are more important to me than an extra 100mhz or so.
So, given that the starting price is £360, what do you think a delidded CPU should sell for? Bear in mind that OcUK have to offer a warranty with it under UK/EU law, and obviously Intel aren't going to cover it, so each return is a £360 loss for them. It's got to take an hour to unpackage, delid, clean, relid, test (as it could have been damaged in the process). Good as I'm sure 8Pack is, I bet one gets damaged on rare occasions.
To be honest you're unlikely to have much change from £499, otherwise it's not worth them bothering. If you're that bothered, do it yourself. I did it with my 4790k (secretly hoping I broke it so I had an excuse to buy Threadripper) and it was... easy.
I do wonder why Intel just can't use the same paste so we have optimum cooling anyway? THought I read somewhere that OCUK has worked with Intel on paste before (advising or something), so why still use one paste that needs to be scraped off and replaced? Surely using a different type of paste to all cpu's regardless of their potential isn't going to add much £ to the CPU manufacturing costs? What a I missing ?
I have no issue with the costs OCUK add on for the service, seems quite fair to me if Intel just cant do it themselves.
Because it runs fine at stock speeds with the cheap paste? Because probably 99% of the CPUs they sell (and probably 50% of the K series ones...) never actually get overclocked, so it's irrelevant? Because by making people delid, they remove their warranty obligation to the CPUs that are stressed the hardest by having loads of voltage rammed through them?