Soldato
- Joined
- 28 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 13,000
Commons debate starting, expecting a lot of virtue signalling, someone will cry "why can't we take 64million refugees?!".
thats not the point, there is a serious shortage of housing in the UK so its hardly easy for us to take in 250K+ people of whatever some would have us do
No idea.how many do you think we should take in then?
So you really are not in a position to say 20k is not enoughNo idea.
Would you like to re-read my posts to check where you think I said that?So you really are not in a position to say 20k is not enough
You implied it with your tone.Would you like to re-read my posts to check where you think I said that?
Pretty much the only mode he operates in. Always funny when even his staunchest supporter/ally gets a taste of what they have been defending.This is top level waffle from Boris. Some Con MPs look pretty annoyed.
I was arguing with people who seem to think 20k is plenty, or too much, based on spurious logic. I was arguing that their logic was wrong.You implied it with your tone.
I guess this sort of childishness is the level of debate we can expect from the anti-asylum crew
Now you’re not reading the posts, I said nothing about the USI was arguing with people who seem to think 20k is plenty, or too much, based on spurious logic. I was arguing that their logic was wrong.
20k might be plenty (though only 5k in year 1, which intuitively feels low) but if it is it's not because Canada is bigger or because you believe (wrongly) thst the US is only taking 30k.
And you weren't one of the people I was arguing with!Now you’re not reading the posts, I said nothing about the US
Tbf, I’ve only been awake for half hour or so. I should go back to bed.And you weren't one of the people I was arguing with!
Ffs Rob. You're a nightmare to converse with!