Displayport is the amd way.
HDMI are phased out since 2010.
I guess thats why.
also requries space on the card.
LOL
Not being funny but they were claiming HDMI 2.0 adapters were just around the corner when I had my 295x2
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Displayport is the amd way.
HDMI are phased out since 2010.
I guess thats why.
also requries space on the card.
Thanks for the info, great to hear that AMD have picked up on this.In addition, Active DisplayPort 1.2a-to-HDMI 2.0 adapters are set to debut this summer. These adapters will enable any graphics cards with DP1.2a outputs to deliver 4K@60Hz gaming on UHD televisions that support HDMI 2.0.
I just wanted todoubletriple check the information i was providing was correct. It was.
Thanks for the info, great to hear that AMD have picked up on this.
I play on 1080p 46" Sony TV. It has excellent input lag figures.
Last time I checked, even best 4K TVs on the market had atrocious input lag. Even from Sony. So I guess my question is, how do you people play games with 60ms+ input lag?
I play on 1080p 46" Sony TV. It has excellent input lag figures.
Last time I checked, even best 4K TVs on the market had atrocious input lag. Even from Sony. So I guess my question is, how do you people play games with 60ms+ input lag?
Samsung's current UHD TVs (and TVs from 2013 if you choose to buy the external One Connect upgrade) have about 20ms input lag, which is really quite excellent by most standards.
Not sure what the response time is at 4k on mine but it looks amazing through my Titan X with no lag
my TV is a SAMSUNG UE48JU7000
No problem at all.
I have being playing today, but I either have a driver issue or the rig I was using had NVIDIA sabotage going on as the performance was not as per expectation, should have being quicker.
Now got the Fury home with me and shall play with it over weekend comparing to my 290X and 980Ti G1. But from the press pack I have the Fury X is a 980Ti competitor, not a beater and not a loser.
Also NVIDIA are not going to move 980Ti price, simply no way as they know MSRP on Fury X is around £549 inc. VAT, same price as their 980Ti which they will argue has more features and more VRAM.
Also NVIDIA will not move price when AMD has such limited stocks and all resellers are price gouging and sell way over £600 due to such limited stocks.
This sub £500 980Ti is a truly genuine deal, a very silly one at that and yes OcUK does lose nearly £3 a card, this is purely a marketing stunt. Take one of the best 980Ti on the market with best warranty and then move sub £500 and make a load of noise!! Marketing!!!!
Will check it out. It's the input lag that worries me, not the pixel response time.
Just pre-ordered the Zotac AMP 980Ti for £499. Sorry AMD but I'm a sucker for a good price.
Thats a stonking price, not sure how OcuK do it
Just pre-ordered the Zotac AMP 980Ti for £499. Sorry AMD but I'm a sucker for a good price.
lol Gibbo and NDAs
Not a single **** is given
Thankyou.
EDIT, These you linked are 15.15 Asder, I have 15.20 Asder installed so I'm presuming they've also had the ini tweak done, Is that right?
I presumed they hadn't but from seeing this and seeing the ones that I already have are also marked as being from Asder I'm presuming he did the same ini tweak for these,
Ahh 15.15 are 11th june compared to 8th June for 15.20 so I'll try them.
I play on 1080p 46" Sony TV. It has excellent input lag figures.
Last time I checked, even best 4K TVs on the market had atrocious input lag. Even from Sony. So I guess my question is, how do you people play games with 60ms+ input lag?