• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Radeon R9 290X with Hawaii GPU pictured, has 512-bit 4GB Memory

Indeed, if the Steam surveys are able to dial down to specific graphics cards, I think it'll show a lot of regular people probably have Intel 4000 onboard graphics!

I doubt a high percentage have 780 or Titans.

Everyone in this forum is in a bit of a bubble, but enthusiasts don't really represent the average user.

Edit - As of September 2013, 0.41% of steam users have Nvidia GTX 780 GPU's.

Highest percentage of DX11 GPU owners (5%) have an Intel 4000.....

http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/videocard/
 
Last edited:
Buckster said:
Lovely card but waiting for 3rd party coolers

In TTL review over 90 in Valley - ouch !

Good watch the TTL review
Click to expand...


That's in quiet mode, which locks the card at 45 percent fan speed or less. Uber mode unlocks the fan at up to 55 percent, and you can use CCC to unlock the fan at up to 100 percent. The card may not use all that fan speed, but you can make it available if the card needs it.

I think temps (and noise) would be very different with the 100 percent fan curve available for cooling.
 
Rusty0611 said:
The price reflects what the market is willing to pay. It's as simple as that.
Click to expand...

A very, very, small part of the market. It's like selling million pound plus hypercars - it looks good on the benchmarks and gets a lot of publicity, but they only sell a few handfuls.

I'm pretty sure Gibbo hasn't sold (let alone ordered) 10,000 Titans for his first order, like he has with R9-920.
 
Steampunk said:
A very, very, small part of the market. It's like selling million pound plus hypercars - it looks good on the benchmarks and gets a lot of publicity, but they only sell a few handfuls.

I'm pretty sure Gibbo hasn't sold (let alone ordered) 10,000 Titans for his first order, like he has with R9-920.
Click to expand...

Would be interesting to know. Not sure he'd say publically anyway. I've never seen him say a particular card/brand is not selling well.
 
Amazing performance for an awesome price, well done ATI. I will not be getting one of these though, don't want to have a 95c card in my case :(. I guess I'm gonna wait for the 780ti or just get a 780 and be done with it.
 
I've been looking forward to this launch, despite knowing that I wasn't going to buy one until the non ref ones are out. The wait is back on!

In other news, I expected it to beat a 780, but it almost consistently beats a Titan. Talk about price for performance. It'll be interesting to see what we can get out of them with better cooling.
 
Steampunk said:
A very, very, small part of the market. It's like selling million pound plus hypercars - it looks good on the benchmarks and gets a lot of publicity, but they only sell a few handfuls.

I'm pretty sure Gibbo hasn't sold (let alone ordered) 10,000 Titans for his first order, like he has with R9-920.
Click to expand...

Yes but it's all relative isn't it? In a horizontal comparison such as this. I'm not sure what your point is in truth. You sound like you're disagreeing with something I've said but then you're talking about something else.

Sorry if I've got the wrong end of the stick. :p

Oh and Gibbo hasn't said he's sold 10000 290/290X. He may have ordered that many but that's different to selling. :)

Titan sold out early on but of course by definition it was never going to be a volume part nor was it intended to.
 
Last edited:
LtMatt said:
I can help you with that Kaapilini.


Click me.
Click to expand...

Using that many GPUs, the result comes down to who can overclock their CPU the highest.

Don't forget 8 Pack scores almost that much in Vantage using a couple of GTX 780s.

No what we need is to use games and benches with uber settings to take the CPU out of the equation, like Heaven 4 at 1440p or 1600p. I could do with a good HD 7950 CF score on there, hint hint.:D
 
Rusty0611 said:
It's almost as 'ridiculous' as your spelling. :p

But seriously though, give over with the fanboy stuff. It's just going to cause arguments. The price of this card is great but it reflects the length of time the 780 and Titan have already been on the market.

Oh and my 780 was only £40 more than a 290X, I've had it in service for months and when it's overclocked it's going to be identical ish performance to a similarly air OC'd 290X unless the temperature of them doesn't increase when overclocking :p.

So no it didn't really invalidate my purchase and nVidia are able to react on pricing if they feel threatened. They have more flexibility on price as well than AMD at the moment by virtue of having been on the market for considerably longer.
Click to expand...

Not a native speaker of english.
I get a letter and word wrong here and there.

We see and I view practical differences here that in a 1920x1080 or even a 2560x setup you be hard pressed doing a double blind study to notice any difference in between different cards and brands. a few fps here and there wont matter much in my book as you just wont notice difference.

so the 290 pro version will be bang of the buck for me.

Nvidia will have to lower prices or they get slaughtered.
 
^^ Not sure Titan is ridiculed tbh, it still has that massive vram, along with running cool and quiet, using a bit less power. The 290X is a great GPU but it does sacrifice heat / temps / noise to get their. That can't just be ignored. Anyone who got a 780 at sub £500 needn't feel to bad either, all that performance for months ahead of AMD's cards and the 780 can be clocked to match the 290X when overclocked. When both cards are clocked to their max, performance difference is negligible.

The best thing about this is with AMD trading punches with the high end, prices on Nvidia's side will have to be adjusted. This is what we want, competition.
 
flopper said:
Not a native speaker of english.
I get a letter and word wrong here and there.

We see and I view practical differences here that in a 1920x1080 or even a 2560x setup you be hard pressed doing a double blind study to notice any difference in between different cards and brands. a few fps here and there wont matter much in my book as you just wont notice difference.

so the 290 pro version will be bang of the buck for me.

Nvidia will have to lower prices or they get slaughtered.
Click to expand...

NVidia don't have to do anything. They will know themselves how threatened they feel not based on the ramblings of a few angry forum posters :p.
 
Boomstick777 said:
^^ Not sure Titan is ridiculed tbh, it still has that massive vram, along with running cool and quiet, using a bit less power. The 290X is a great GPU but it does sacrifice heat / temps / noise to get their. That can't just be ignored. Anyone who got a 780 at sub £500 needn't feel to bad either, all that performance for months ahead of AMD's cards and the 780 can be clocked to match the 290X when overclocked. When both cards are clocked to their max, performance difference is negligible.

The best thing about this is with AMD trading punches with the high end, prices on Nvidia's side will have to be adjusted. This is what we want, competition.
Click to expand...

By quite a way ahead.
 
I've just purchased one to compare directly against the Titan so will post some findings up myself. Looking forward to playing with one :)

I will say that with the performance the 290X appears to be offering it does put the Titan in a bad light on paper. But when you understand just what a monster the gK110 is to manufacture you respect it more.

I couldn't justify having 3 simply because of the 780Ti being so close round the corner, but curiosity got the better of me. One will do just fine :D.

As Boomstick has pointed out there are other factors to consider. For one, I don't think the 290X is a viable option in small form factors given the operating temps. I'll be sure to give a fair comparison anyway.
 
Last edited:
Kaapstad said:
Using that many GPUs, the result comes down to who can overclock their CPU the highest.

Don't forget 8 Pack scores almost that much in Vantage using a couple of GTX 780s.

No what we need is to use games and benches with uber settings to take the CPU out of the equation, like Heaven 4 at 1440p or 1600p. I could do with a good HD 7950 CF score on there, hint hint.:D
Click to expand...

Still world records broken apparently. :)

I was reading a review site, can't remember which one. Heaven 4 seems to slightly favour Nvidia cards, something to do with the tessellation.

I will post a Heaven bench don't worry. I'll have another go. At the very least ill run a light overclock just to complete it. I just get annoyed with it because i always seem to crash on the last part. Happened so many times last few times i tried. Gets annoying after a while.
 
LtMatt said:
Lol you're going to be ruffling feathers left right and centre if you keep saying that.

Will be interesting to see if the 290X does ridicule a titan in Battlefield 4 when Mantle arrives. That's the quiet rumour doing the rounds.
Click to expand...

Price for performance its ridiculed.
Nothing else make sense for me
Titan isnt a bad card and those buying it could afford it and was happy doing so.
Nvidia set a premium for the high end which now is revoked.
wont mean people stop buying Titans just beacuse a new card enters that is priced better and faster in 4k gaming by 20% its how the world works, some just buy things no matter what on perception alone.

Mantle yea, december will be interesting.
2x290 for crossfire m8?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom