Associate
True but what is driving the sales of the 9800x3d? Is it the fact it outperforms a several year old CPU or the fact it faster than a 14900k at certain Res like 1440p or 1080p.I know this is a 9800X3D thread but, pursuant to my previous gripe with HUB content, I see they've now done another pointless comparison of the 14900K and Ultra9 285K. We all know the 14900K is faster! They even say at the end that there are some improvements coming for the 285K which just renders this video even more irrelevant as it will probably all change soon.
If they're this desperate to put out content, how about doing a comparison of the 9800X3D against much older CPUs, like 4/5/6 generations old?
Many people I know only upgrade their machines every 4/5/6 years and want to know what kind of bump they can expect if they upgrade. Try finding any information on how much faster a 9800X3D would be than a 9700K or a 5600X for example, in real-world games with a decent GPU at a sensible res like 1440p.
That kind of info would be far more useful to the average person wanting to know where to put their money than endlessly rehashing what we already know.
</rant>
The AVG user don't really watch HUB they watch stuff like Linus and jay2cents.
Even if they upgraded to a 5800x3d or 12900k from a 7700k or whatever they would have seen large performance gains. Most people know even the AVG user knows for the longest of time intel produced the fastest gaming cpu's. Where brute force and sheer nuclear power station sapping power draw is how they maintained their dominance. Irrevelvant of the 9800x3d.
What has changed this narrative is now it uses less power and can still beat it at certain Res.
It is beating the 14900k that's why people want it. They might not necessarily game at 4k but I assume they most certainly will be at 1440p. And as it stands the 9800x3d is the CPU to beat at that Res
You are beginning to sound a bit of an echo chamber around here in this thread.