Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Just release the damn chips already!
Just release the damn chips already!
Just release the damn chips already! I dont want to wait any longer
I have a pc to build and im pretty much just waiting on the 3600x to get released....
Are you American?
Was going to ask the same thing
On topic, I'd take the 13% IPC with a grain of salt, Not saying it wont be but people need to keep the expectations in check . I don't think we will see any where near 5Ghz either tbh.
Hope am wrong though
You are wrong
https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/amd-zen2-ipc-has-29-percent-higher-ipc.html
AMD 'Zen 2' IPC has 29 percent higher IPC
Please stop posting misleading "news" story titles. That headline does not follow from a single test result being 29% faster.You are wrong
https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/amd-zen2-ipc-has-29-percent-higher-ipc.html
AMD 'Zen 2' IPC has 29 percent higher IPC
Can't see any benchmarks nor actual specs , My point still stands
Please stop posting misleading "news" story titles. That headline does not follow from a single test result being 29% faster.
lol, are you laughing or what?
The news coming from Expreview mentions that AMD performed DKERN + RSA tests for integer and floating point units and that resulted into a score of 4.53, that was 3.5 for the first-generation Zen and that indeed is a 29.4 percent IPC. Of course, these are number from the manufacturer themselves and have to be observed with caution as other benchmarks have not been mentioned. So I have to add though, 29% "in certain workloads". Still, impressive.
Are you seriously suggesting that Zen 2 will have an average IPC increase over Zen 1 of 29%? Because that's what the headline implies.lol, are you laughing or what?
The news coming from Expreview mentions that AMD performed DKERN + RSA tests for integer and floating point units and that resulted into a score of 4.53, that was 3.5 for the first-generation Zen and that indeed is a 29.4 percent IPC. Of course, these are number from the manufacturer themselves and have to be observed with caution as other benchmarks have not been mentioned. So I have to add though, 29% "in certain workloads". Still, impressive.
Are you seriously suggesting that Zen 2 will have an average IPC increase over Zen 1 of 29%? Because that's what the headline implies.
So you agree the headline is misleading? If so, it's probably best not to post it, or at least put a huge caveat next to it.No. Max IPC increase of 29% or higher. Average can be 15%...
So you agree the headline is misleading?
Also companies obviously use the best numbers they can get away with so if AMD's figure is ~13% it's probably more realistically ~10%.Hilbert is that you??? Really that title is utter ********. The 29% IPC increase is only in FPU operations in a specific scientific workload. To claim "it's a 29% IPC increase" is disingenuous at best and an outright lie at worst.
The improvement that's been quoted by AMD literally today was ~13% average IPC improvement over Zen+ (which is actually higher than expected for average IPC uplift).
Totally agree. I've been working on 10% and 4.8GHz boost for them as the likely targets. Anything more is gravyAlso companies obviously use the best numbers they can get away with so if AMD's figure is ~13% it's probably more realistically ~10%.
Also companies obviously use the best numbers they can get away with so if AMD's figure is ~13% it's probably more realistically ~10%.
likely targets