Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Not when your on a Corporate Laptop that blocks Chrome Addins it isnt
How do you intend on getting an i5 9600 to work on a B450 AM4 board?looking forward to seeing 9600k vs 3600x personally. specially at the same price using b450
My basket at Overclockers UK:
- 1 x Intel Core i5-9600K 3.7GHz (Coffee Lake) Socket LGA1151 Processor - Retail= £239.99
- 1 x Gigabyte Z390 UD Intel Z390 (Socket 1151) DDR4 ATX Motherboard= £109.99
- 1 x Team Group Vulcan T-Force 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 PC4-24000C16 3000MHz Dual Channel Kit - Grey (TLGD416G30= £74.99
Total: £435.47 (includes shipping: £10.50)
$250 - into £197 odd plus VAT leaving at £230
My basket at Overclockers UK:
- 1 x Intel Core i5-9600 3.10GHz (Coffee Lake) Socket LGA1151 Processor - Retail= £218.99
- 1 x MSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (Socket AM4) DDR4 ATX Motherboard= £119.99
- 1 x Kingston HyperX Predator 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 PC4-25600C16 3333MHz Dual Channel Kit (HX433C16PB3K2/16)= £89.99
Total: £439.47 (includes shipping: £10.50)
should prove interesting but then everyone will be looking at the 8 and 12 cores which is a shame
Anywhere i can get a translation of that site?
We are approaching the premiere of Ryzen 3000 processors and therefore AMDit organizes special events around the world, where it praises the capabilities of these CPUs. On one of them (in London), the company decided to reveal something about the overclocking potential offered by the Zen 2 CPUs, and Travis Kirsch of AMD revealed which of the company's new processors would be the best. Interestingly, it will not be any of the models from the highest Ryzen 9 series. "It seems to me that with our top models you will initially be quite limited in this regard," Krisch admitted, adding that their "Boost algorithms squeeze almost everything, what you can get, so maybe you can go off about 200 MHz. You can definitely get more from our 65 W models because their specification works at a lower power level. So you can turn up the processor, squeeze all the power out of it and of course get more space [on OC - note. ed.]. "
This 65-watt Ryzen 7 3700X is supposed to be the "crown jewel" in the field of twisting as part of the Ryzen 3000 series.
Thus, Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 7 3800X, which TDP is 105 W, will probably not be the best choice for fans of overclocking processors, because their capabilities in this aspect can be very limited. This 65-watt Ryzen 7 3700X is supposed to be the "crown jewel" in this range, as part of the Ryzen 3000 series. It is worth emphasizing, however, that this information is based on preliminary tests of new processors and the Kirsch team did not have the final layouts in their laboratories long enough to fully analyze their OC potential and admitted that they may be "very surprised by what people will achieve with them". Already at the start we will get 6 new CPUs from this family, and probably soon AMD will expand the offer with another, no longer suffix X in the name, so we will have a lot of testing.
Ryzen 7 3700X is 65 W CPU whose clocks in Turbo mode reach 4.4 GHz. The higher model, that is Ryzen 7 3800X, is already 105 W processor with a maximum clock rate of 4.5 GHz. If the potential of the first one is confirmed, it is not difficult to imagine that this will overtake the higher model in terms of efficiency after proper treatment. The more so that both will be sold with 125 W Wraith Spire cooler, which provides power reserves, without problems dealing with heat generated even during their maximum load. Taking into account the price difference of 70 USD, Ryzen 7 3700X (329 USD) may turn out to be a very popular choice among players.
Googly translated
Really doesnt tell me anything except for the cooler used in the last paragraph.
^^^@orbitalwalsh - i think we may have some recent build/spec advice we need to edit in the other forums...I am sure you'll be interested to hear, that competition at that end of the market is going to get weirder too, since from the info I have been given the 2700X is going to be <£199, the 2700 <£159 and the 2600 <£109, with the 2600x <£129, should see the prices from 1st July or maybe a day or two before apparently.
How do you intend on getting an i5 9600 to work on a B450 AM4 board?
That feels almost unfair. Diminishing the advantage of the larger cache instead of saying that Ryzen has established a new base level of how large a cache should be.
Geekbench single core scores....
8600K 5694
3800X 5406
3600X 5390
Not exactly mind blowing, although I'll probably still buy a 3700X.
Now I'm curious if AMD will publish the safe range for vcore. Also what sort of deg are you getting that high of volts.
[...] AMD's claim of 4.7Ghz boost for the 3950x could well be the all core boost under PBO and not the single core boost.
Looks like the 3700x then is going to be the "Gamers Choice" if the above is true that you may be able to push them a decent bit higher... definitely need to see reviews now.
It is worth emphasizing, however, that this information is based on preliminary tests of new processors and the Kirsch team did not have the final layouts in their laboratories long enough to fully analyze their OC potential..
Precision Boost is just the more refined clockspeeds; the 25MHz increments.
PBO is a whole different beast, and has only previously come as standard on 2nd gen Threadripper.
There'll be some decent coverage of that price bracket as it is the highest volume, well the 3600 is not the X.
I am sure you'll be interested to hear, that competition at that end of the market is going to get weirder too, since from the info I have been given the 2700X is going to be <£199, the 2700 <£159 and the 2600 <£109, with the 2600x <£129, should see the prices from 1st July or maybe a day or two before apparently.
I've no doubt that it will make some very interesting builds for low budgets, <£230 for a decent B450/2600/16GB DDR4 3000MHz, not a very hard sell at all.
How do you intend on getting an i5 9600 to work on a B450 AM4 board?
If you push the chip into the socket really hard it always bends to your will. Eventually.
Rock, paper scissors... rock, paper, scissors... oh damn I broke itThe pins on the LGA1151 are on the socket, while the pins on the AM4 socket are on the CPUs.
So, pins against pins won't work, for sure.
The pins on the LGA1151 are on the socket, while the pins on the AM4 socket are on the CPUs.
So, pins against pins won't work, for sure.
If you push hard enough everything works.
How do you intend on getting an i5 9600 to work on a B450 AM4 board?
Precision Boost is just the more refined clockspeeds; the 25MHz increments.
PBO is a whole different beast, and has only previously come as standard on 2nd gen Threadripper.
Nice thick layer of liquid metal between socket and CPU base should ensure a good connection.It's actually the holes on the i5 against the holes on the AM4. Won't work, for sure
Gives you a great boost to OC potential too as you can get more juice into your CPU with less resistance.Nice thick layer of liquid metal between socket and CPU base should ensure a good connection.