-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
AMD Zen 2 (Ryzen 3000) - *** NO COMPETITOR HINTING ***
- Thread starter Jamin280672
- Start date
Soldato
3000@CAS 16 isn't exactly crap, it's probably what an average consumer would be around.
Caporegime
But still an impressive score, at 4.2Ghz its like a 4.8Ghz Skylake / Coffeelake.
Fair point, but an average consumer probably wouldn’t be on here.
It bodes well TBH, all things considered.
will be if asus ever update the official supported cpu range on their website and also continue to tweak the bios down the line as i imagine there will be at least another 2 bios tweaks over the next 12 months for the 3000 series to tighten up possible timings and efficiencies.
Soldato
Caporegime
Soldato
It also doesn't suddenly make it crap. I admit that these leaks would be better for 3600@C15 or so would be nicer to see.
I currently have Vengeance 3466 running at 3200 C14 currently, I hope I can push them a bit further on an X570 board.
3200 C14 benchies would be a better comparison was what I meant. I think the new chips look good and I for one will be buying.
Was just pointing out that the RAM speed and timings were sub-optimal compared to Zen+.
Soldato
No arguing that, but all the leaks coming out seem to be weird in terms of RAM timing just now. Reviews are only a few weeks away though so we should soon know.
Soldato
Is that supposed to be good?
I only ask as my 9700K beats it CPU 3770 cb.... CPU single 517 cb.....MP ratio 7.30x
I am hoping AMD kills Intel in gaming. And I don't mean TRADES BLOWS
Soldato
Only cares about gaming, selects 64GB RAM. Sounds about right
3900X all day long, even on the scant information AMD have put out
Permabanned
Is that supposed to be good?
I only ask as my 9700K beats it CPU 3770 cb.... CPU single 517 cb.....MP ratio 7.30x
I am hoping AMD kills Intel in gaming. And I don't mean TRADES BLOWS
Its not too shabby for the lowest product in the stack with 2 less cores.
Is your i7-9700K overclocked? If not it should be running at 4.9 GHz in the single core test. The R5 3600 would be at 4.2 GHz. So 94% of the single core performance in this test but at 86% of the clock speed and around 55% of the price.Is that supposed to be good?
I only ask as my 9700K beats it CPU 3770 cb.... CPU single 517 cb.....MP ratio 7.30x
I am hoping AMD kills Intel in gaming. And I don't mean TRADES BLOWS
Bear in mind this is the lowest SKU.
Permabanned
Only cares about gaming, selects 64GB RAM. Sounds about right
3900X all day long, even on the scant information AMD have put out
I will take 64GB of ram for free always.. you can stay on your high horse and reject the offer and buy 2x8GB ram sticks
Last edited:
Soldato
Its not too shabby for the lowest product in the stack with 2 less cores.
Is your i7-9700K overclocked? If not it should be running at 4.9 GHz in the single core test. The R5 3600 would be at 4.2 GHz. So 94% of the single core performance in this test but at 86% of the clock speed and around 55% of the price.
Bear in mind this is the lowest SKU.
I down clocked it to 5.0 GHz.
So it's not going to be a killer gaming cpu?(forget about the cost of the cpu)
Not as much as a killer gaming CPU as the 3800X which is up against the 9700K.
But the 3600 (Non X) does a bloody good job considering its AMDs slowest CPU in the current 3000 series.
That's not bad at all. My 8086k at 5.1 Ghz did 535.
Soldato
So the 3800X will beat the 9700k by miles in gaming?
I have my 9700K at 5.2GHz all cores when gaming.
I fancy a change
So the 3800X will beat the 9700k by miles in gaming?
I have my 9700K at 5.2GHz all cores when gaming.
I fancy a change
We will not know until after the release which is the 7th of July. It is looking promising though.