Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Link us a game benchmark that proofs that 16gb is not enough.. After windows loads im sitting at 14300 free physical memory. I Think Division 2 barely hits 7000mb@4k from what I'w seen rescently. Monster Hunter World was around 6000mb
He didn't even mention gaming.According to who? and doing what? Theirs a very informative video on you tube that shows difference between 8gb, 16gb and 32gb in a lot of modern games, from 8gb -16 their was marginal difference and between 16gb to 32 their was zero difference and most games did not come close to using the 16gb
Yes, 16 GiB is the current sweet spot, just like 6 GiB used to be and then 8 GiB. But we're enthusiasts, aren't we?I think 16 is still plenty! its probably still the sweet spot for most people. But I do think within the next couple of years, 32 will become the norm
The Ryzen 9 3900X flashed up at £479.99 briefly at a major UK retailer before the listing was taken down.
That's pricey. Supposed to be like 390.The Ryzen 9 3900X flashed up at £479.99 briefly at a major UK retailer before the listing was taken down.
So yeah pretty much the RRP we expected.
I think everyone will follow the price guidance unless there are shortages.
That's pricey. Supposed to be like 390.
That's pricey. Supposed to be like 390.
Nice, the CH7 had the same BIOs as the previous update on that board so I expect the new AGESA to be updated soon.
He was thinking of 3800X I am sureAccording to who?
Does give you some mega breathing room though for when that mythical day the 8-core PS5 and Xbox set a new baseline for PC gaming specs.I know i wont use the extra cores of the 3900x. But Will the extra "game" cache be of benefit is the real question over the 3800x. I dont mind paying the extra £100 for the double cache and extra 4 cores and threads. But if it makes no difference then the 3800x is the one i am going for
tech radarAccording to who?
If that's stock for stock, looks like a massive increase over the 2700x
Where have You read that ?? Amd said its 499 bucks so 390 is hmm like whatttttThat's pricey. Supposed to be like 390.
Where have You read that ?? Amd said its 499 bucks so 390 is hmm like whattttt
Ryzen 7 2700X 105W- 16980 Passmark points
Ryzen 7 3700X 65W- 23557 Passmark points
~40% higher score in 62% of the electricity consumption.
Typos yeah? No way is 3900 under £400.tech radar
- AMD Ryzen 9 3950X: $749 (about £590, AU$1,080)
- AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: $499 (about £390, AU$720)
- AMD Ryzen 7 3800X: $399 (about £310, AU$580)
- AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: $329 (about £260, AU$480)
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: $249 (about £200, AU$360)
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600: $199 (about £160, AU$290)