Because it has better speeds and timings out of the box. Also Samsung B die, vs Ballistix using Micron E die
So 32gb over 16gb doesnt really matter ? Its all confusing for me lol
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Because it has better speeds and timings out of the box. Also Samsung B die, vs Ballistix using Micron E die
So 32gb over 16gb doesnt really matter ? Its all confusing for me lol
why does everyone assume all people do on their pc's is play games32gb will give no benefit in gaming, higher speed, tighter timings and lower CL will give a lot of benefit.
32gb will give no benefit in gaming, higher speed, tighter timings and lower CL will give a lot of benefit.
Why is the GPU clocked 10% lower for the 3900X?
Does anyone know how much better the single threaded performance will be for higher spec Ryzen 3000 CPUs? Like 3700X? Will these CPUs beat the 9900k by a decent amount, or are the scores very similar?
why does everyone assume all people do on their pc's is play games
Because the majority do, its only a minority of people need more memory for other reasons.
Even then its Ryzen, a slow 32gb kit isnt worth it.
Lol.c'mon m8 everything looks better then grey
Because the majority do, its only a minority of people need more memory for other reasons.
Even then its Ryzen, a slow 32gb kit isnt worth it.
Frequency/latency makes no difference to my video editing. Tried 2400 cl14 v 3200 cl14 same render time.
Exactly, similar, maybe in some cases beat it with decent memory etc and certain workloads, but probably paste it in heavily multithreaded workloads for around the same costNo, they won't beat the 9900k "by a decent amount". Be similar, we hope.
Im toying with the idea of getting another 2 sticks of RAM, taking me up to 32GB. But all I do is game and youtube.... The obvious answer is stick with 16 for now. But then as I have B die I likely wont be able to find matching sticks in ~2/3/4 years time.
Im toying with the idea of getting another 2 sticks of RAM, taking me up to 32GB. But all I do is game and youtube.... The obvious answer is stick with 16 for now. But then as I have B die I likely wont be able to find matching sticks in ~2/3/4 years time.
Except for direct stream copy cutting&joining video editing is heavily computationally bottlenecked.Frequency/latency makes no difference to my video editing. Tried 2400 cl14 v 3200 cl14 same render time.
Until that 16GB runs out...32gb will give no benefit in gaming, higher speed, tighter timings and lower CL will give a lot of benefit.
DDR5 may well be out but I plan on keeping my Zen2 setup for at least 5 years. I wont be jumping straight onto DDR5 for the hell of it.By then DDR5 will be out surely and you would have moved on to that?
3600mhz just makes sense for this platform... Plug, xmp, play your games....
Still tempted by the Ballistix myself, all comes down to user-case / cost. Cost doubles to go from micron-e 3200C16 to samsung-b 3600C16. Not really known how well the cheaper stuff will clock or the effect on performance with Ryzen 3.
If you only need 16GB the cost difference isn't too much to swallow but at 32GB it's an extra £150+. Don't need more than 16GB for gaming but for some dev work and running virtual machines etc 32GB is worth while. Plus 16GB doesn't feel like much of an upgrade when have been on it for 7 years.
Except for direct stream copy cutting&joining video editing is heavily computationally bottlenecked.
Until that 16GB runs out...
At that point its clocks/latency are as usefull as lawnmover in moon rocket.
With just minimal programs at background 16GB will be fine for year or so.
But once next-gen consoles are out, then memory usage of AAA/big budget games is going to increase.