Caporegime
When they were ahead they started doing all the platform segmentation too and holding back in other areas too.Except they didn't need 3Dvcache CPUs to beat Intel when they were doing well, the FX CPUs were stupid anyway, only a bit faster than the standard CPUs AFAIK but cost a lot more.
The issue is the boards already have risen in cost and stagnated in feature set below £200.The supposed big sell on AM5 is that you save money as you don’t need to upgrade the board for a few generations of cpu, Boards makers don’t like this though as they are selling less boards so to counter their loss of revenue they charge much more per board which in the end makes the saving on AM5 a false economy.
Also how many years have we got on AM5? Zen5 might be the last generation and at best it is Zen6. After that we are probably seeing a new platform anyway.
Then WTF is B840 giving you then over an A620?The rumour says it is using Promontory 19,ie,B550/A620A chipset,which is older. There is also no overclocking or undervolting on the A620 and B840.The A620 isn't going anywhere at all, and will continue for a long time yet. The 840 is replacing the lower end 650 equivalents, and the 850 the better boards.
But also in the realworld,the A620 is priced so close to the B650,it offers no advantage.
For £110 you can get a B650 motherboard(ASRock B650M/HDV) which has good VRMs and a modern Promontory 21 chipset. The Gigabyte B650M DS3H is only £130 and has 4 RAM slots. In fact,quite a few solid sub £150 B650 motherboards are available which are only a few quid more than the A620 motherboards. Where is the room for B840 in this unless it's £100?
Unless B840 is an OEM only release,that would slot the B840 upto £200. The B850 would replace the B650E which starts just under £200.
Last edited: