Spawn said:Also dont forget that Watson, the Aussie all rounder hasnt even figured in any of the Test matches...guess thats a relief for the English as hes pretty devastating with the bat and ball...much better than Flintoff imho.
Didn't see much of the champions trophy, last I saw of him was when Pietersen was smacking him around the rose bowl. How can he be compared to flintoff yet when hes played 3 test matches. Even with his bad ankle Flintoff is 8th ranked bowler in the world and 2nd raked all rounder and that isn't by fluke.
Watson has played 4 innings with a high score of 31 and a "devastating" strike rate of 38 (averages less than Ashley Giles). If hes devastating then Ian Bell at 50 strike rate is the next Afridi.
With the ball hes got a nice average of 60 odd. Even in ODI's where he's played more games his average is 31 compared to Freddie's 26. His batting average is also lower than Freddie's in ODI's too and Freddie's been playing in one of the worst ODI teams in the world.
He is a decent player and might turn out to be quite a useful player but to start saying he's much better than Flintoff is wishful thinking. If he was then he'd already be a permanent member of the Australian side.