I managed to get need for speed most wanted to install and run (at 640x480!) on this pc so I've had a mess about with the setting in both positions. With that mind, here's what I've discovered.
Overdrive set to off (white bar covering NO on the selection screen):
- Some minimal normal ghosting from high contrast areas in NFS:MW, e.g. dark streetlight poles against the bright white/blue sky
- None of the nasty negative ghosting on Devious's videoclip
- General video playback, including HD content, is smooth
Overdrive set to on (white bar covering YES on the selection screen):
- A tiny amount of normal ghosting in NFS:MW. Now some negative ghosting as seen on Devious's videoclip is apparent too
- Nasty negative ghosting on Devious's videoclip
- General video playback, including HD content, appears harsh and flickery
So basically, while overdrive does reduce standard ghosting it introduces harsher and more noticeable "negative" ghosting, where a white or near-white ghost appears to move ahead of an area. This is a problem for video especially and is what makes it appear to be flickery. The HD video I was watching was a nature thing of bright lakes reflecting the sun on dark brown muddy land. As the camera panned across the overdrive was causing this high-contrast area appear to flicker. Without overdrive the experience was much better.
To reiterate, the horrible ghosting on Devious's video occurs when
overdrive is enabled as I understand it from my testing.
In conclusion, overdrive allows Asus to claim the 2ms response time at the expense of making the display look rubbish! Good call, Asus
Without overdrive, it's probably getting 5ms like the Samsung 225BW.
I now have a problem. I don't know whether to get the display swapped under warrenty, or return it for a refund (which I can do because of the backlight defect) and get the Samsung instead... which according to reviews has the problem of backlight bleed, and I want to watch movies on it.
*sigh*
Back to square one really!