I’ve played this through twice now and I must say I don’t understand the overhype this is getting in quarters.
The game for me is a solid 9/10. It is very good but I’ve seen so many people calling it “perfect” or 10/10.
The game has some real flaws still. Some of them are flaws that was present in Divinity Original Sin (the first one). I’m delighted with the game but some of the little things can still really **** me off.
I think the overhype is because it's a game that is rather an anomaly in the current market of half-baked AAA games, horrible console ports and titles infested with predatory microtransactions, gamble boxes and battle passes etc. BG3 dares to be old school, with attention to detail, polish and storytelling which isn't afraid to be bold and challenging (rather than running scared of causing offence at every turn).
It's definitely not perfect, my main gripe is that whilst normal difficulty is for the most part fine, story and tactician difficulty seems to have been achieved largely by rigging the dice rolls for or against the player. Personally I find this frustrating, especially in tactician. But normal mode with karmic dice switched off is for the most part well balanced.
It's certainly a 9/10 by modern standards, but perhaps an 8.5/10 were it released when the games industry was in a healthier state (but then a title like this wouldn't have been technically possible back then).