If I paid attention to every review I'd be playing on a console - God forbid.
I'm off to wash my mouth out.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Batman™: Arkham Knight Performance
- Thread starter tommybhoy
- Start date
If I paid attention to every review I'd be playing on a console - God forbid.
I'm off to wash my mouth out.
No, they haven't.
It's just a typical moanfest about x/y/z that happens on here more often than I like to see. Same as internet reviews from users. New game has teething issues. Shock horror.
I just find it moronic that you've not even played the game yet you're crying about the game more than most people in this thread.
Soldato
What are you implying?
I think it is safe to say the majority are having problems with this game in terms of performance, you just have to look at the reviews across the entire internet; steam, metacritic etc. Has any game from the last year received as much back lash as this? Not even the witcher 3 got as much hate despite the MASSIVE downgrade in graphics, performance issues at the start (mainly hairworks being way over tessellated)
The only people who I have seen saying that the game plays smoothly are the ones with the fps cap set to 30 still and going by youtube videos, it doesn't look "buttery" smooth to me, I can still see juddering (watching them with 60 fps option). Fair enough if people are finding it smooth but 30 fps is still 30 fps no matter how you try to spin it. I could probably play the game happily enough since it isn't a game that requires 60+FPS like other types of games i.e. FPS shooters but still we shouldn't have to....
Besides, regardless of the performance issues, it still doesn't change the fact that:
- the pc port was handled by a **** company and we weren't told this until the rep mentioned it when addressing the issues, which I'm sure he is probably getting a lot of **** from his boss about letting that slip...
- pc graphics aren't even as good as the consoles, no AO, missing & pop in textures, no rain effects on batman, the bat mobile
- disabling the FPS cap apparently makes some of the physics effects spas out
So people are genuinely happy that their £700+ PC is not providing as good of an experience as a £300 (?) console? So much for "pc master race"....
The only people who I have seen saying that the game plays smoothly are the ones with the fps cap set to 30 still and going by youtube videos, it doesn't look "buttery" smooth to me, I can still see juddering (watching them with 60 fps option). Fair enough if people are finding it smooth but 30 fps is still 30 fps no matter how you try to spin it. I could probably play the game happily enough since it isn't a game that requires 60+FPS like other types of games i.e. FPS shooters but still we shouldn't have to....
Besides, regardless of the performance issues, it still doesn't change the fact that:
- the pc port was handled by a **** company and we weren't told this until the rep mentioned it when addressing the issues, which I'm sure he is probably getting a lot of **** from his boss about letting that slip...
- pc graphics aren't even as good as the consoles, no AO, missing & pop in textures, no rain effects on batman, the bat mobile
- disabling the FPS cap apparently makes some of the physics effects spas out
So people are genuinely happy that their £700+ PC is not providing as good of an experience as a £300 (?) console? So much for "pc master race"....
Associate
I hope you're right and other developers take note.
Soldato
That IQs. Have exponentially dropped. On here. Today.
I don't know Scotty!
Seems to be an odd air about the place. Perhaps it's because the Fury X is coming out. Too many geeks jizzing with excitement and anticipation and it's permeating the forums?My FPS cap is 9999 or something, game is fine for me.
That IQs. Have exponentially dropped. On here. Today.
I don't know Scotty!
Perhaps it's because the Fury X is coming out. Too many geeks jizzing with excitement and anticipation and it's permeating the forums?
I see said the blind man
Soldato
- Joined
- 1 Jun 2014
- Posts
- 5,103
Edit: Actually, forget it. I won't be drawn into a pointless argument.
Enjoy the game, those of you who can. And I hope the rest of you find a solution soon.
Enjoy the game, those of you who can. And I hope the rest of you find a solution soon.
Edit: Actually, forget it. I won't be drawn into a pointless argument.
Enjoy the game, those of you who can. And I hope the rest of you find a solution soon.
Nice ninja
So by your post you haven't even play the PC version?
Running fine here with ave of 70+ fps.
Might be fine for you guys but from what others are saying (and that is a lot more than just a handful of people), removing the FPS cap and even when getting 50+ fps, apparently the stutter is awful. Also, are you guys not noticing issues with the physics like the others?
iirc, you have a gsync monitor whyscotty? If so, that is probably hiding a lot of the stutter for you.
Soldato
- Joined
- 1 Jun 2014
- Posts
- 5,103
Nice ninja
So by your post you haven't even play the PC version?
Nope, waiting on a new build next month before tackling it.
Granted I've only played it for 30 minutes or so, but I noticed nothing strange or odd looking. Like I said, it played fine for me. The only issue I had was a little bit of tearing but that can be solved with Nvidia adaptive sync I imagine.
Soldato
Only Witcher 3 performance was improved, and it still uses the same amount of tessellation as it did on day one. Any comparisons on why the graphics aren't apparently as good as PS4? Considering it has none of the GW libraries. Or in some cases the same number of pixels.
I'm all for instigating this as there are clearly some big issues that need addressing, but I don't really think you've got the right idea.
Classic Chinese whispers.
Yes mate, but I use the ULMB feature not Gsync.
However, having 12Gb of vram could possibly be making the difference.
No offence - your opinion on how the game plays is groundless, until you have.
Soldato
- Joined
- 1 Jun 2014
- Posts
- 5,103
None taken. But I haven't offered an opinion on how the game plays. At all.
What I did do was offer an opinion on the selfishness of those who think that their own personal experiences should apply to everyone, and that if it doesn't, the others must be wrong in some way.
Yeah have you ?
Did rocksteady port this or make it from the ground up? I hear the DRM used is resource hungry. Why lock
the FPS if it can be unlocked so easily (only for the likes of us and not normal PC gamers)? Gameworks seems a bit of a joke?
How can you up the minimum requirements hours before release? What are AMD/nVidia playing at?
I was so chuffed buying this game yesterday? GTA V, whilst running (performance) great, still isn't fixed (crashing) and now
this! PC master race
GameWorks, Denuvo DRM and a port handled by Iron Galaxy? Genuinely surprised that it runs at all.
Another quality gameworks title I see.
Breaking News
In an effort to increase flagging sales of this awful game the devs have decided to give away a free GTX 980 Ti with every game code sold.