• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

BF V(5) MP CPU ulilization

@BTVA Done, i'm uploading now, it has made a difference but not much in terms of Frame Rates, the CPU is working hardware for it tho...
 
Ryzen 1600 @ 3.9Ghz without SMT
GTX 1070 +100/+400

Ignoring those 1 second 80% dips the GPU is still mostly locked to 97%, i don't know why 97% but MSI AB reads that in most of my games, unlike with SMT enabled it does now occasionally dip to below 95%, so there is a small difference, tho i think overall its just a couple of % on the averages.
The CPU is now working a lot harder, with SMT on the was roughly around 70% on all threads, with it off its 90%+ on all, sometimes clearly the 6 threads are getting into the high 90% and the GPU uterlisation dips a little from its usual 97%.

 
Last edited:
So, I don't usually check frame rates etc but if anyone would like to suggest a piece of software to grab some data I'm more than happy to to a few runs tonight.
 
I would suggest to just ignore the utilisation % and focus solely on min, max, average, 1% low, 0,1% low, basically just the output result.
 
FRAPS has a benchmarking function with Min - Avr - Max, it also puts out an Excel.

Its very old software now, i don't know if it will work with BFV, i'll give it a go later.

http://www.fraps.com/
 
My 2500K @ 4.6Ghz is pinned at 100% constantly. GTX 780 is also around 95-100% with frame rates averaging 55FPS on lowest settings @ 2560x1440. Game still looks surprisingly beautiful but its a painful gaming experience.

I've got at 1080ti arriving tomorrow but I've not yet decided on what new CPU to pair it with. I'm about to pull the trigger on an 8086K as I don't think I can wait till the i9s are released. Far too impatient.
 
toxicredcat said:
My 2500K @ 4.6Ghz is pinned at 100% constantly. GTX 780 is also around 95-100% with frame rates averaging 55FPS on lowest settings @ 2560x1440. Game still looks surprisingly beautiful but its a painful gaming experience.

I've got at 1080ti arriving tomorrow but I've not yet decided on what new CPU to pair it with. I'm about to pull the trigger on an 8086K as I don't think I can wait till the i9s are released. Far too impatient.
Click to expand...

Mmm, if you get the 8086k overclock it to 5ghz or more and that chip will be an absolute stonker.
 
This could be the beginning of the end got my 4770k / 8GB DDR3 2133MHz PC... Ive not run into any problems before in achieving a smooth 60fps on highish settings with my 390x (which is now dead anyway).
 
humbug said:
^^^^ Yeah but its a bit boring :p
----------

I posted a Ryzen 1600 a few posts up guys, on a better GPU a Ryzen 2000 6 cores + will probably get about 20% higher performance given the clock speed and IPC improvements.

Look i'm getting an average of about 80 FPS, 90% of that is tied to GPU Performance.

Ryzen is NOT as good a gaming CPU as an 8700K but it seems with a 1600 i'm getting pretty good performance in a game that clearly is very hard on the CPU, about to the limits of what my overclocked GTX 1070 can manage at 1080P.

That's all that matters really, if you have any requests let me know.
Click to expand...

Can you do a benchmark using afterburner? It's pretty decent. Would be interested in yours lows.
There is an option to bind to a key, so load g maps etc don't effect results.
 
OK, just did a quick run through - 3440x1440, ultra settings

Frames: 6246 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 104.1 - Min: 79 - Max: 148

This is recorded with OBS - obviously has an impact on frame rates but you can see the cpu usage.


If anyone else wants me to do any other tests let me know
 
Last edited by a moderator:
toxicredcat said:
My 2500K @ 4.6Ghz is pinned at 100% constantly. GTX 780 is also around 95-100% with frame rates averaging 55FPS on lowest settings @ 2560x1440. Game still looks surprisingly beautiful but its a painful gaming experience.

I've got at 1080ti arriving tomorrow but I've not yet decided on what new CPU to pair it with. I'm about to pull the trigger on an 8086K as I don't think I can wait till the i9s are released. Far too impatient.
Click to expand...

Same position.

Running I5 2500k at 4.5ghz
GTX 1060 6gb
1080p in High
Averages 50-60fps lows in the 30s

1440p frames ruins my eyes

Cpu is 100% constantly. I am looking to buy a new mobo, cpu and ram. October/nov
 
OK, just used Afterburner to record a run, conquest snow map, run from hills down to the water, 1080p Ultra. PBO enabled.

06-09-2018, 22:45:24 bfvob.exe benchmark completed, 7871 frames rendered in 59.360 s
Average framerate : 132.6 FPS
Minimum framerate : 98.7 FPS
Maximum framerate : 166.2 FPS
1% low framerate : 78.2 FPS
0.1% low framerate : 38.2 FPS
 
JediFragger said:
Friend of mine has a 2500k (with a 980Ti+1440p Gsync) and is running it fine, no hiccups etc.
Click to expand...

I find that hard to believe. I posted above my specs and the frame rates are struggling 64player maps


Running I5 2500k at 4.5ghz
GTX 1060 6gb
1080p in High
Averages 50-60fps lows in the 30s

1440p frames ruins my eyes

Cpu is 100% constantly. I am looking to buy a new mobo, cpu and ram. October/nov
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom