People are pranking TV shows about this already. Something so tragic and people still do this..
An important point is that the rebels brought down a military transport craft in the area shortly before this airline went down. It's possible that the rebels assumed this was a second transport craft, as the intercepted calls do suggest they thought it was a military aircraft.
Well there is an audio recording of Pro-Russians acknowledging they've shot down a civilian plane - pretty clear I think!
Well previous incident involving the former Soviet Union have been a case of denial followed by months of investigating then responsibility being taken and an apology being released.
Most likely case imo if it was a missile that brought it down. However, surely other passenger planes had used that same route that day and maybe that hour? So even if untrained, why pick out MH17 and not one many that went before it?
Agreed. That's what I said a few pages ago, you don't just shoot down a passenger plane - if you're trained you'd be able to tell a passenger plane.
I can't imagine many airlines tick the "missile lock detection" box on the options sheet to be honest.
You mean like the yanks was when the blew up British personal carriers in Iraq?
Oh that's right a yank got it wrong![]()
given when it was designed it was probably made so that a conscript with no prior training could fill in for a dead operator with minimal instruction from the rest of the crew.
also given the cold war climate odds are no one thought there would be any civilian planes in a world, war, a "we have no planes in this area so have an auto destroy mode, to avoid the problem of the conscript being asleep" is quite a sensible idea.
An important point is that the rebels brought down a military transport craft in the area shortly before this airline went down. It's possible that the rebels assumed this was a second transport craft, as the intercepted calls do suggest they thought it was a military aircraft.
Basing on previous occurrences, how on earth can an apology be a suitable remedy?
We just don't, in this day in age, go around shooting up civilian aircraft. Russia/Ukraine aren't even on any war footing, so why would either have the need or even desire to do that?
it would be pointless anyway.
A boeing with chaff flares and how would you make any evasive manoeuvres with that plane so a pointless box to tick
Basing on previous occurrences, how on earth can an apology be a suitable remedy?
We just don't, in this day in age, go around shooting up civilian aircraft. Russia/Ukraine aren't even on any war footing, so why would either have the need or even desire to do that?
Because it could easily have been a tragic accident... **** happens unfortunately, especially if the person operating the machinery isn't properly trained. The same was nations just apologise when they do similar, or blow up hospitals/civilian houses. See Israel and the blowing up of those kids on Wednesday and the US calculated attack on civilian airliners (in fact did they ever apologise?).
A friend of mine who works in the ATC and has been in the Army told me that Passenger planes are "lit up like a Christmas tree" so even at 10k it would be identifiable if using a SAM.
So it was either a mistake, which to operate a SAM is hard to believe as they're quite technical pieces of kit. Or, it was done on purpose, which is frightening. Or it wasn't a missile.
If you've seen behind enemy lines, it will have een the guy in a track suite who done it.