Boeing 777 shot down

An important point is that the rebels brought down a military transport craft in the area shortly before this airline went down. It's possible that the rebels assumed this was a second transport craft, as the intercepted calls do suggest they thought it was a military aircraft.

This is probably what happened, I doubt they would be well trained for such a weapon and have mistakenly fired at it. Total tragedy but it's not the first time this has happened.
 
Well there is an audio recording of Pro-Russians acknowledging they've shot down a civilian plane - pretty clear I think!



Well previous incident involving the former Soviet Union have been a case of denial followed by months of investigating then responsibility being taken and an apology being released.

Basing on previous occurrences, how on earth can an apology be a suitable remedy?

We just don't, in this day in age, go around shooting up civilian aircraft. Russia/Ukraine aren't even on any war footing, so why would either have the need or even desire to do that?
 
A stark reminder of what can happen when you supply what is effectively an organised yet inexperienced militia with comparitively advanced weaponry. If an American AEGIS Cruiser, with all of its advanced kit, a seasoned captain and crew, and all of the checks and balances involved in Navy protocol can make a catalogue of errors leading to the downing of a civilian airliner, then what is the liklihood of a poorly trained, trigger happy seperatist making the wrong call when left in charge of a SAM launcher?

I hope we get closure on this eventually, if only to provide some scant level of peace for the families of the victims. Unfortunately in the short to medium term all we'll have is denials and rhetoric, tragedies aren't about those directly affected, they're about political point scoring.
 
Agreed. That's what I said a few pages ago, you don't just shoot down a passenger plane - if you're trained you'd be able to tell a passenger plane.



You mean like the yanks was when the blew up British personal carriers in Iraq?
Oh that's right a yank got it wrong ;)
 
I can't imagine many airlines tick the "missile lock detection" box on the options sheet to be honest.


it would be pointless anyway.
A boeing with chaff flares and how would you make any evasive manoeuvres with that plane so a pointless box to tick
 
given when it was designed it was probably made so that a conscript with no prior training could fill in for a dead operator with minimal instruction from the rest of the crew.

also given the cold war climate odds are no one thought there would be any civilian planes in a world, war, a "we have no planes in this area so have an auto destroy mode, to avoid the problem of the conscript being asleep" is quite a sensible idea.

As I said in the other thread if the Ukrainian audio releases are real then the rebels didn't realise civilian planes were still overflying the area. An auto mode wouldn't be out of the question if that was the case.

That may imply a tragic accident and miscommunication, not a calculated attack. The only side that would benefit from a calculated attack on the plane would be the Ukrainian military, then blaming the rebels. that would be a pretty high stakes gamble though and supremely unlikely.
 
An important point is that the rebels brought down a military transport craft in the area shortly before this airline went down. It's possible that the rebels assumed this was a second transport craft, as the intercepted calls do suggest they thought it was a military aircraft.

Gung-ho from one success it's quite likely that this is what happened.
 
Basing on previous occurrences, how on earth can an apology be a suitable remedy?

We just don't, in this day in age, go around shooting up civilian aircraft. Russia/Ukraine aren't even on any war footing, so why would either have the need or even desire to do that?

I'm not saying its a suitable remedy, simply pointing out how it will most likely pan out when looking at the previous!
 
it would be pointless anyway.
A boeing with chaff flares and how would you make any evasive manoeuvres with that plane so a pointless box to tick

Depends what missile has been fired and what system you have on the plane, you can get a laser jamming pod, which some UPS planes + others have fitted.

Might not work everytime, but it's better than nothing.
 
Basing on previous occurrences, how on earth can an apology be a suitable remedy?

We just don't, in this day in age, go around shooting up civilian aircraft. Russia/Ukraine aren't even on any war footing, so why would either have the need or even desire to do that?

Because it could easily have been a tragic accident... **** happens unfortunately, especially if the person operating the machinery isn't properly trained. The same was nations just apologise when they do similar, or blow up hospitals/civilian houses. See Israel and the blowing up of those kids on Wednesday and the US calculated attack on civilian airliners (in fact did they ever apologise?).
 
Because it could easily have been a tragic accident... **** happens unfortunately, especially if the person operating the machinery isn't properly trained. The same was nations just apologise when they do similar, or blow up hospitals/civilian houses. See Israel and the blowing up of those kids on Wednesday and the US calculated attack on civilian airliners (in fact did they ever apologise?).

They never admitted fault or even apologised, although they did give the families compensation. About $200,000 a person.
 
A friend of mine who works in the ATC and has been in the Army told me that Passenger planes are "lit up like a Christmas tree" so even at 10k it would be identifiable if using a SAM.

So it was either a mistake, which to operate a SAM is hard to believe as they're quite technical pieces of kit. Or, it was done on purpose, which is frightening. Or it wasn't a missile.

No, the most likely scenario is they simply didn't realise it was a passenger plane. Ref the 'Christmas tree' - It was day time!

They're likely not experienced/we'll trained - that's all... operating the kit itself likely isn't too complicated.

Given the US navy managed to make the same mistake with an Iranian airliner it's very plausible that one of the rag tag bunch of fighters did this without realising they were shooting a passenger plane.
 
If this was an SA-17 type Buk launcher it is able to detect transponders and determine if it was a civilian aircraft. Reports so far say it was this type so this rules out auto-mode being used, it also strongly suggests the operator was not fully trained. This system is radar tracking.
 
Last edited:
If you've seen behind enemy lines, it will have een the guy in a track suite who done it.

bBBoslr.jpg
 
In an ideal world this tragedy would prompt both sides to end the conflict peacefully. Sadly the reality will be months of blame being used politically while the fighting continues.
 
Back
Top Bottom