I'm clearly arguing from a binary perspective?
We're also talking about a country that literally makes being openly gay illegal.
What are you arguing and what does being gay have to do with any of this?
Reports i've read state that she does indeed have "female bits".
What reports say that?
Do you have a source that backs up your statement that she "doesn't really have female bits"?
The IBA, she failed two chromosome tests, she's an XY male with DSD which clearly gives her an athletic advantage, she obviously won't have female bits.
If you're stating Khleif has a genetic advantage, then how is that some athletes with genetic advantages* is fair but others are not? Where exactly are you drawing the line and why?
There are various obvious lines to draw - if you're unfamiliar with the sport boxing has weight classes for example, the line is the boundaries for those weight classes.
Some events have age ranges, so there's another line drawn - the age range.
Some events might be held for disabled athletes - so there's another line - does the competitor have the relevant disability?
And now there are the male/female events... it seems pretty sensible to have separate male and female events with boxing as there is an obvious safety issue in addition to fairness issues. There might be some exceptions where someone is intersex with no impact on performance but that doesn't appear to be the case here or with the original issues with Semenya.