Competitors - a clarification

Status
Not open for further replies.
rules have been clarified

Really?

ThundyCat said:
Will keep this short and sweet.

There is to be no mention of Amazon's digital download service as they're a bigger competitor to our core business of hardware.

-------------------------------------

Another turn around on the actual rules we've been told? :( Are we allowed to talk about their DD wing or not. :confused:

Yes but not a game we sell as that is direct competition.
 
hmm, seems like a complete PR **** up to me,

why not just make OCuk game prices more competitive or sell something else.

I think generating an interest in PC gaming, which pointing out bargains does, can only help OCuk sell hardware, seems a very odd approach to me.

too manyrules ends up spoiling things in the end,
 
Last edited:
What happens when steam run a big sale? Blank out the one game OcUK sells and then everyone will see it anyway when they check Steam :p
 
The rules have just been unclarified by this thread though.

Contrary to the sticky, apparently we're allowed to mention Amazons DD service as long as we don't mention games OcUK sell. I.e. the whole thing that Neil was banned for is fine.

Can we have the sticky updated to reflect this as well?

now i really am confused lol, so thats two Dons and a commi, saying two different things,

if only SPIE!!!!! was around to lay the law down in simple easy to swallow bites lol ;p

*even the sticky has gone now,

i would really love to know, who actually decided on this rule, as telescopi said Spie is away, and nearly everyone is saying something different, is there an official rule? or is it just some random confused words that have gotten even more confused over time? lol
 
Last edited:
Wanting people sacked for getting some forum rage? Some perspective required I think, what kind of employer would that make OcUK?

well technically we want him sacked cause he gets rubbish prices for us as customers.

if he got good prices we wouldn't care what he acted like as long as the products where cheaper here than anywhere else.
 
I think it's worth bringing up two other forum members that were banned/suspended in this riot.

sldsmkd got permabanned for creating a Forum that would have no rules regarding mentioning of the competitors in the PC Gaming subforum.

And Wynthorpe came out with a Nazi comment in the heat of discussion (he only got suspended which seems reasonable).

Why are the members paying for their mistakes (?) when the Dons are clearly above the law?
 
Thundys sticky on the DD service is gone so whats in here by Telescopi are the rules now as far as im concerned

^ ah Ace Modder, almost forgot he kicked it all of i bet he posted that and went to Ibiza for a fortnight, never seen him since :P
 
Last edited:
Started very well...

Hi,

I don't think it's reasonable to ban all mention of Amazon, any more so than it's possible to ban mention of tesco, asda or comet.

As has always been the policy (certainly for the last few years) has been that mentions of larger firms who have their fingers in many pies are okay so long as you aren't mentioning products that directly compete with OcUK.

Hence talking about toasters from comet or beans from tesco is fine, but telling people about their laptop deals isn't really on (say what you like, they wouldn't let us post our deals in their store!).

To be clear, kindle fine, games we don't sell fine, hardware not cool, games we sell (yeah, all of them) not cool.

Ended rather badly...

A few dons lost their temper yesterday but to be fair to them under heavy trolling - yes trolling.

Please chill out and stop the trolling or this will go on and on and end badly.

"End badly" - what does that mean? Closing all the forums?
 

Oh my! I never got the chance to see the Unban thread until now, and this is just incredible.

Valkia said:
Right.

I will unban Neil IF:


1) We all get along
2) You do respect other members and dons
3) You understand our point from previous threads.
4) no promotion of the "new" digital download service.

All good?
 
well technically we want him sacked cause he gets rubbish prices for us as customers.

if he got good prices we wouldn't care what he acted like as long as the products where cheaper here than anywhere else.

Exactly, why is OcUK no listening to their customers?

We can give you the exact pricing we would expect to be at least marginally competitive but you don't listen!
 
I'm not happy with what went on last night. I sat there at my computer desk thinking 'What a ridiculous bit of pettiness from OCuk'. I don't consider OCuk's main selling point as a games distributor and I will probably never bother looking at that side of things when shopping here. It was a massive PR balls up and it doesn't seem to have been sorted out at all by the organization. We need more clarification on what we can or cannot do, can we talk about Steam at all? Can we name smaller competitors?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom